← Teams

SHC-Macdonald/Henningsen

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.58 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Nancy Garlock
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.33
Ruth Semon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Linda Mertz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Rebecca Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Carmen Warda
published 3.5
3.14
Monica Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2022-11-13Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Victoria Rigby vs Wendy Hill / Marilyn von Bergen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-29Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesMonica Christensen / Rebecca Harris vs Jeny Joseph / Mary Jesse6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBetsy Henningsen / Ruth Semon vs Gina Ariosa / Jan Funkhouser6-3, 6-1
2022-10-22Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesShella Razon-Lumetta / Ruth Semon vs Lori Vranizan / Margo Reifenrath6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-02Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesVictoria Rigby / Monica Christensen vs Gail Bolte / Heather MacPherson6-1, 6-2
2022-09-24Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Ruth Semon vs Shelly Cruze / Joanna Conan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-18Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesNancy Garlock / Lisa Mayer vs Nenette Olson / Robin Burak6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMonica Christensen / Rebecca Harris vs Patti Dybdahl / Lisa West6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLisa Mayer / Nancy Garlock vs Dayna Porter / Catherine Greenblatt6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMonica Christensen / Betsy Henningsen vs Sarah Larson / Laura Shier2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Macdonald / Ruth Semon vs Elise D Harvey / Erin Doucet6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nancy Garlock
29W–30L career · type A
not enough data
—
3.5
Ruth Semon
51W–32L career
0%99%1%
3.33
3.5
Linda Mertz
19W–20L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Rebecca Harris
8W–16L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Carmen Warda
68W–35L career
5%95%0%
3.16
3.5
Monica Christensen
27W–36L career
8%92%0%
3.14

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.