Teams

Bainbridge/Powell

2025 Flint River USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall · Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Overman / Amy Thomas vs Kelley Corbari / Becky Bush6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesJoan Overman / Carie Crowley vs Gina Herring / Tracey Cohen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-28vs Albany/CurtisWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeigh Cooper / Niki Cox vs Layne Cox / Joan Lake6-3, 6-0
2024-09-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesNiki Cox / Leigh Cooper vs Tracey Cohen / Gina Herring4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-09-19vs Camilla/BushLost 01
L#3 DoublesNiki Cox / April Powell vs Kristen Whitfield / LaDonna Delk4-6, 4-6
2024-09-07vs Albany/CurtisWon 20
W#1 DoublesSheryl Cannington / Joan Overman vs Terri Coleman / Lucy Kelley7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaran Barber / Niki Cox vs Layne Cox / Joan Lake7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Leigh Cooper
published
3.37
Niki Cox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Susie Hartzog
published
3.29
Joan Overman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Karan Barber
published
3.22
Sheryl Cannington
published
3.20
Carie Crowley
published 3.5
3.07
April Powell
published 3.5
2.97
Melanie Feliz
published
Genia Kimmel
published
Meghan Edgar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Cooper + Niki Cox8156% games−3.1% vs expected
Leigh Cooper + Carie Crowley213 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Cooper + Joan Overman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Cooper
38W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Niki Cox
51W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Susie Hartzog
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Joan Overman
32W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Karan Barber
11W–22L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Sheryl Cannington
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Carie Crowley
16W–22L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
April Powell
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Melanie Feliz
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Genia Kimmel
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Meghan Edgar
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.