Teams

CCW MCCLELLAND

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-30vs FHCS THORNALLYWon 10
W#1 SinglesTroy Kittelson vs Jeff Boehm6-4, 6-2
2023-05-23vs MEMPK GOLDSTEINSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLance McClelland / Don Borchelt vs Changseok Lee / Nick Butler6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAdan Briones vs Anthony Bohuslavsky4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-16vs MEMPK ABELLOLost 12
L#2 DoublesBrad Michelson / Adan Briones vs Chace Passanante / Adam Pienciak2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesTroy Kittelson vs Gregory Smith6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLance McClelland / Rande Short vs William Stone / David Evans1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-02vs LTFCS VANDEVEERLost 02
L#1 DoublesLance McClelland / Troy Kittelson vs David Clipsham / Vincent Lopez1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAdan Briones / Eric Scott vs Andrew Michaelson / Andy Field3-6, 4-6
2023-04-25vs GOG ENGELAGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesLance McClelland / Troy Kittelson vs Jason Carter / Timothy Stacey6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesWilliam Tostanoski / Adan Briones vs Craig Engelage / Jack Denton1-6, 4-6
2023-04-18vs CSRC GAYDOSLost 12
L#1 DoublesTroy Kittelson / Bruce Bugno vs Nate Hopkins / John Abbott5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLance McClelland vs Marcos Velasco6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTom Jackson / Adan Briones vs John Swenson / Jeff Carpenter4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Lance McClelland
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Tom Jackson
published
3.24
Troy Kittelson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Harsha Nagaraj
published
3.16
Eric Scott
published
3.15
Bruce Bugno
published 3.5
3.03
William Tostanoski
published
2.94
Brad Michelson
published 3.5
2.92
Nathan Pritchard
published
2.91
Rande Short
published
Adan Briones
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Don Borchelt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Pritchard + Troy Kittelson4256% games+4.8% vs expected
Harsha Nagaraj + Tom Jackson8948% games+3.5% vs expected
Lance McClelland + Troy Kittelson11657% gamesnot enough data
Eric Scott + Lance McClelland314 matchesnot enough data
William Tostanoski + Nathan Pritchard044 matchesnot enough data
Rande Short + William Tostanoski033 matchesnot enough data
Eric Scott + William Tostanoski033 matchesnot enough data
Eric Scott + Troy Kittelson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lance McClelland
82W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.42
Tom Jackson
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Troy Kittelson
69W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Harsha Nagaraj
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Eric Scott
11W–18L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Bruce Bugno
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
William Tostanoski
7W–27L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Brad Michelson
13W–36L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.94
Nathan Pritchard
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.92
Rande Short
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Adan Briones
35W–11L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Don Borchelt
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.