← Teams

PTC-Lee/Irvin

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Rachel Novak
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.55
Cathleen Lang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Miki Han
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.26
Gretchen Newcomb
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Lia Irvin
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Lyudmila Leissler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.04
Ann Cassin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Karen Kraus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results10 ties
2024-03-28Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Cassin / Gretchen Newcomb vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-24Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs Alena Lauritsen / Terry Mettler6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Melissa Smith6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMiki Han / Rose Lee vs Sheila Schmidt / Astrid Andreu6-4, 6-3
2024-03-16Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRachel Novak / Stefano Cavallucci vs Morgan Cowling / Daniel Turner6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLyudmila Leissler / Adam Rainey vs Gabriela McIntosh / Peter Singson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathleen Lang / Tim Janes vs KEELEY PLOMBON / Huy Bui7-6, 6-2
2024-03-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLyudmila Leissler / Adam Rainey vs Erin Casey / Christopher Graham0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDouglas Hill / Rachel Novak vs Jeri Finn / John Magaddino6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCathleen Lang / Tim Janes vs Van Hong Nguyen / Bill Henderson6-3, 6-4
2024-03-01Lost 2–3
L#1 DoublesCathleen Lang / Gretchen Newcomb vs Shannon Chen / Andrea Yao6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Laura Rundle7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMiki Han / Elizabeth Raman vs Helen Chen / Heather Lee4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs Jinmi Kemple6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnn Cassin / Karen Kraus vs Janet Ha / Lara Greenberg6-1, 6-1
2024-02-24Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesGretchen Newcomb / Lyudmila Leissler vs Louanne Fuller / Alana Rhea6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Danielle Barrett6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMiki Han / Elizabeth Raman vs Teresa Darling / Vanessa Weber6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs Zoey Mikalatos / Julie Kafoury6-4, 6-1
2024-02-11Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesCathleen Lang / Lyudmila Leissler vs Erin Casey / Michelle Johnson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Christina Melander3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGretchen Newcomb / Rachel Novak vs Kate Oliver / Megan Finn6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Raman / Miki Han vs Hilary Johnson / Teufelin Traylen6-4, 6-2
2024-02-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRachel Novak / Gretchen Newcomb vs Natasha Weinstock / Puntrigar Suriyaseang7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMiki Han / Elizabeth Raman vs Jane Moffat / Jennifer Bane6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs Teresa Zhao / Amy Pickens4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-20Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLyudmila Leissler / Cathleen Lang vs Alison Davis / Kim Wright4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Larson / Miki Han vs Gretchen Wagner / Wendy Whitsell6-2, 6-3
2024-01-06Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesLia Irvin / Rachel Novak vs Edwardeen Hilts / Laura Maginnis6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Cassin / Elise D Harvey vs Adrienne VanBeckhoven / Naun Yvonne Kim6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs Jen Lewis / Cara Williams6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Rachel Novak
71W–39L career
1%98%0%
3.73
3.5
Cathleen Lang
67W–68L career
0%68%32%
3.55
3.5
Miki Han
56W–22L career
0%90%10%
3.46
3.5
Gretchen Newcomb
49W–70L career
1%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Lia Irvin
63W–43L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Lyudmila Leissler
69W–45L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Ann Cassin
45W–69L career
26%74%0%
3.04
3
Karen Kraus
79W–102L career
0%97%2%
2.84

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.