Teams

LA - Slice Slice Baby

2026 One Doubles - Local League Only - LA · LA - Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-21vs LA - High StrungLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoelle Boucai / Corinna Cherian vs Karine Chung / Jennifer Wexler1-6, 3-6
2026-03-14vs LA - Slice GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesGloria Hann / Eunice Lakis vs Gina Petersen / Liz Rosman2-6, 2-6
2026-03-01vs LA - Mulholland WhiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Roxworthy / Michelle Levin vs Cassandra Jean Amell / Bree Turner6-3, 6-1
2026-02-14vs LA - Development HellWon 10
W#1 DoublesGloria Hann / Eunice Lakis vs Sasha Silver / Kristina Woo6-1, 7-5
2026-02-07vs LA - Mulholland WhiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoelle Boucai / Corinna Cherian vs Ani Yemenidjian / Hillary Lowe6-2, 6-4
2026-01-31Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Roxworthy / Michelle Levin vs Candace Young / Melissa Young3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-01-31vs LA - Ladybugs - BlackLost 01
L#1 DoublesGloria Hann / Corinna Cherian vs Melinda Martinez / Lauren Miranda2-6, 4-6
2026-01-17vs LA - Ace HolesWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Roxworthy / Joelle Boucai vs Lulu Liu / Alyssa Jeong Perry6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · LA - Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA - High Strung6262451
2LA - Ladybugs - Black6262668
3LA - The Tough Asks5353753
4LA - Slice Girls5353760
5LA - Mulholland Navy5353763
6LA - Kick Aces5353860
7LA - Slice Slice Baby4444862
8LA - The Rookies4444868
9LA - Ace Holes4444966
10LA - Development Hell35351281
11LA - Mulholland White35351289
12LA - Ladybugs - Red35351384
13LA - Ladybugs - White26261487
14LA - Baby Got Backhand17171485

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Emily Roxworthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Sarah Noonan
published
2.38
Eunice Lakis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Joelle Boucai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Michelle Levin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Corinna Cherian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.09
Gloria Hann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Roxworthy
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
Sarah Noonan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
Eunice Lakis
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Joelle Boucai
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Michelle Levin
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Corinna Cherian
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Gloria Hann
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.