Teams

KC GREEN

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-06vs KC TEALLost 12
W#1 DoublesConnie Grieshaber / Rachel Schneider vs Sharon Seemann / Susan Khanna6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesCristin Konkel vs Susan Bratschun2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLauren Plain / Jeralyn Hickey vs Jami Jensen / Sara VanHook6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-08-30vs HRCA TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Santangelo / Cristin Konkel vs Cathy Sorensen / Olivia Zuncic3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLauren Plain vs Ann Patel6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Grieshaber / Rachel Schneider vs Kathleen Samuelli / Tara Simmons4-6, 1-6
2021-08-16vs LEBTC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeralyn Hickey / Cristin Konkel vs Jane Braaten / Angelena Gleason6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLauren Plain vs Kelly Raab7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-08-09vs CCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChar Eiken / Connie Grieshaber vs Robyn Tripp / Lynne Paris7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Santangelo / Jeralyn Hickey vs Barbara Petersen / Michelle Robinson6-4, 6-3
2021-08-02vs HRCA REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesRachel Schneider / Jeralyn Hickey vs Deborah Miller / Shannon Porter7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCristin Konkel vs Amy Tharp2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChar Eiken / Abigail Lee vs Cinda Nab / Nantida Hong1-6, 3-6
2021-07-26vs PH BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesCristin Konkel / Char Eiken vs Kori White / Kennedi Pettofrezzo4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLauren Plain vs Arlene Cole0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Schneider / Jeralyn Hickey vs Christy Brant / Ming Hall6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Lauren Plain
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Char Eiken
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Jennifer Richey
published
Abigail Lee
published 3
Connie Grieshaber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Cristin Konkel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Jeralyn Hickey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Susan Santangelo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lauren Plain
89W–34L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Char Eiken
24W–34L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Jennifer Richey
4W–10L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Abigail Lee
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Connie Grieshaber
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Cristin Konkel
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeralyn Hickey
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Santangelo
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.