Teams

RS-PARROTT

2025 · 2026 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-05vs HOCO-JONESLost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Gray / Mike Eader vs Aaron Montoya / Juan Gomez Gonzalez3-6, 3-6
2025-10-02vs HOCO-JONESLost 02
L#2 SinglesRandy Williams vs Akram Saymeh2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMike Eader / Michael Robinson vs Brian Harper / Joseph Cecchini1-6, 1-6
2025-09-18vs HOCO-JONESSplit 11
W#2 DoublesStephen Seth / Eli Jones vs Blake Corrigan / Akram Saymeh1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Robinson / Randy Williams vs Joseph Cecchini / Rodrigo Morales0-6, 1-6
2025-09-11vs HOCO-JONESWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephen Seth / Eli Jones vs Kevin Lankford / Blake Corrigan6-2, 6-1
2025-09-01vs HOCO-JONESLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Eader / Stephen Seth vs Greg Landa / Terry Jones4-6, 2-6
2025-08-28vs HOCO-JONESWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Robinson / Randy Williams vs Akram Saymeh / Terry Jones6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2026 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RS-PARROTT25142148359

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Bill Waldrep
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
3.03
Damien Parrott
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.75
Joel Ginaldi
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.68
Mike Eader
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Charlie Lanphier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Randy Williams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Stephen Seth
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Damien Parrott + Bill Waldrep8162% games+15.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bill Waldrep
24W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Damien Parrott
24W–22L career · 17 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Joel Ginaldi
21W–23L career · 10 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Mike Eader
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Charlie Lanphier
14W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Randy Williams
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Stephen Seth
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.