Teams

Milam 4.0W 40s Fri AM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-02vs Rosenbower 40s 4.0W Fri AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline McAlister / Lynne Murray vs Kimberly Eberhard / Lesley Rossato4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-25vs Parr 40s 4.0W Fri AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynne Murray / Ann Evans vs Tracy Harlan / Heather Parr6-2, 6-3
2025-04-22vs Egerton 40s 4.0W Fri AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Evans / Lynne Murray vs Tara Burgio / Kathryn Egerton7-5, 6-2
2025-03-28vs Pyrtle/Ramsey 40s 4.0W Fri AMLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynne Murray / Ann Evans vs Lindsay Olin / Mary Currie4-6, 2-6
2025-03-21vs Mcfarlin/Guglielmo 40s 4.0W Fri AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesSaundra Westervelt / Lynne Murray vs Shawn McFarlin / Catherine Tanner3-6, 3-6
2025-03-14vs Shamburg 40s 4.0W Fri AMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCynthia Sarwi / Nancye Milam vs Jennifer Mays / Bridget Gislimberti0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Morris / Suzanne Rudy vs Alyce Warden / Courtney Penley6-4, 6-3
2025-03-07vs Albright 40s 4.0W Fri AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Murray / Saundra Westervelt vs Sara Nundkumar / Maggie Riley2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Lynne Murray
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.68
Ann Evans
published 4
3.67
Ann Morris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
3.63
Cynthia Sarwi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Megan Guarini
published
3.47
Druid Michaels
published
3.38
Nancye Milam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Suzanne Rudy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Cookie Guarini
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Rudy + Ann Evans303 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Murray + Caroline McAlister213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Murray
161W–88L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Ann Evans
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Ann Morris
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Caroline McAlister
4W–16L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Cynthia Sarwi
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Megan Guarini
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.61
Druid Michaels
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.47
Nancye Milam
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Suzanne Rudy
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Cookie Guarini
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.