Teams

GSTL18/CATOE/PRESTWICK

2025 Adult 18 & Over - GSTL · Adult Men 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-01vs GSTL18/Fedele/GrandeDunesLost 12
W#1 DoublesJonathan Catoe / Jacques Dolphin vs Daniel Fedele / Nick Malasi2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDouglas Bradshaw / Chris Denny vs Jessel Elliott / Reid Moman1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Silbiger / Amar Patel vs Tom McKeever / Terry Walden4-6, 1-6
2025-04-03vs GSTL18/Fedele/GrandeDunesLost 12
L#2 DoublesDavid Hong / Patrick Mattingly vs Reid Moman / Ryan Roark1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesStephen Silbiger vs Daniel Fedele2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Doyle / Douglas Bradshaw vs Ryan Smith / Terry Walden6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2025-02-06vs GSTL18/Fedele/GrandeDunesLost 23
L#1 DoublesJacques Dolphin / Stephen Silbiger vs Terry Walden / Kenneth Santiago7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJonathan Catoe vs Madison Barrett3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDerek Harris / Patrick Mattingly vs Jak Lerdgidkjon / Jessel Elliott3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSandy Hendrick vs Nick Malasi4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDouglas Bradshaw / David Hong vs Tom McKeever / Warren de Villiers6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jacques Dolphin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Derek Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
David Hong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Paul Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Chris Denny
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Douglas Bradshaw
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jonathan Catoe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Matt Duke
published
Patrick Mattingly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Hendrick
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Stephen Silbiger
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Doyle + Douglas Bradshaw123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacques Dolphin
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.37
3.5
Derek Harris
49W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
David Hong
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Paul Doyle
4W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
3
Chris Denny
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Douglas Bradshaw
10W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Catoe
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Duke
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Mattingly
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Hendrick
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Silbiger
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.