Teams

Hills/Agnew/55&Over9.0W

2024 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-02vs HCC Wine for the Win - M. RosetWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Turnes / Ann Carlson vs Michele Ironsmith / AnneMarie Masson0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTania Biller / Jami Patterson vs Katie Healy / Marcy Faircloth5-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Rondeau / Joan Simmons vs Linda Dodds / Margaret Roset6-3, 6-1
2024-02-24vs HCC Wine for the Win - M. RosetSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristine Rondeau / Joan Simmons vs AnneMarie Masson / Michele Ironsmith7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Carlson / Mary Turnes vs Marcy Faircloth / Margaret Roset3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-10vs HCC Wine for the Win - M. RosetWon 10
W#3 DoublesDenise Agnew / Joan Simmons vs Katie Healy / Julie Martin7-6, 6-0
2024-02-03vs HCC Wine for the Win - M. RosetLost 01
L#3 DoublesDenise Agnew / Mary Paul vs Michele Ironsmith / AnneMarie Masson4-6, 1-6
2024-01-27vs HCC Wine for the Win - M. RosetWon 20
W#1 DoublesDenise Agnew / Mary Paul vs Linda Dodds / Margaret Roset6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Baldwin / Tania Biller vs AnneMarie Masson / Michele Ironsmith2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-20vs HCC Wine for the Win - M. RosetLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Agnew / Christine Rondeau vs Linda Dodds / Katie Healy6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Baldwin / Faith Sincich vs Michele Ironsmith / AnneMarie Masson5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Blount / Joan Simmons vs Dianne Albina / Uyen Tran4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Elizabeth Baldwin
published
4.37
Denise Agnew
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.07
Joan Simmons
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.05
Ann Carlson
published 4.5
3.88
Mary Turnes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Tish Wissel
published
3.74
Tania Biller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Faith Sincich
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Simmons + Denise Agnew7357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Baldwin
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.50
4.5
Denise Agnew
97W–36L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
4.37
Joan Simmons
94W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Ann Carlson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
Mary Turnes
33W–62L career · 2 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
3.88
Tish Wissel
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Tania Biller
75W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Faith Sincich
39W–52L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.