Teams

Smash and Dash

2026 18&over Women Day Winter · 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-24vs SAC LadiesLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Southren / Diane Boyle vs Catalina Maione / Lourdes Arena5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-17vs Hot ShotsLost 01
L#3 DoublesBetsy Halstead / Diane Boyle vs Kaitlin Wittleder / Azadeh Esmaeili7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-24vs The NomadsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Hecker / Christiane Mahoney vs Lorraine Kent / Erin Sussman7-6, 5-3
2026-02-03vs NJD: Glam SlamLost 04
L#1 DoublesKristen Hecker / Kirsten Neville vs Elizabeth Robins / SALENA MAHR7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesFrancine Lusardi vs Praxedes Molina4-6, 6-6
L#2 DoublesDara Mitchell / Gabriela Manzano vs Coleen Mills / Crystal Paone4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRegan Trent / Lisa Southren vs Kandace Simpson / Monika Korolkiewicz2-6, 6-7
2026-01-13vs Sugar and SliceWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristiane Mahoney / Heather Meyers vs Mary Anne Vaughn / Marci Clark6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Boyle / Regan Trent vs Christina Pallotta / ANGELA LARKIN6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Brianne Tuthill
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Christiane Mahoney
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.95
Edith Wisniewski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Kristen Hecker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Francine Lusardi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Diane Boyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Angela Warman
published 3
Betsy Halstead
published 3
Dara Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Anna Walz
published 3
Gabriela Manzano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Heather Meyers
published
Kirsten Neville
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Reed
published
Lisa Southren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marie Bradford
published
Melissa Tomasello
published
Regan Trent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Theresa Wirth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Hecker + Melissa Tomasello0537% gamesnot enough data
Christiane Mahoney + Kirsten Neville314 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Wirth + Melissa Tomasello303 matchesnot enough data
Edith Wisniewski + Kristen Hecker123 matchesnot enough data
Christiane Mahoney + Heather Meyers033 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Hecker + Kirsten Neville123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brianne Tuthill
3W–0L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Christiane Mahoney
64W–80L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
Edith Wisniewski
46W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Kristen Hecker
10W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Francine Lusardi
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Diane Boyle
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Angela Warman
5W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Betsy Halstead
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Dara Mitchell
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Anna Walz
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Gabriela Manzano
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Heather Meyers
8W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kirsten Neville
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Reed
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Southren
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Marie Bradford
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Tomasello
9W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Regan Trent
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Theresa Wirth
24W–32L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.