Teams

SLHBE-Berkley/Jetton 18 2.5 Sing am

Lake USTA 18 & Over Summer Singles League · Women 2.5 Singles 18+

9 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-23vs SLAWI-WITHERSPOON/WESTPORTWon 30
W#1 SinglesChristina Prejean vs JoAnna Kauffman6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMolly Stokas vs Taysha Wendt6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesBradee Cicchinelli vs Cynthia Enright6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesChristina Prejean vs Jenna Stolldorf6-0, 6-0
2025-07-15vs SLAWI-WITHERSPOON/WESTPORTWon 30
W#1 SinglesHeidi Berkley vs Taysha Wendt6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesQuincy Eassa vs Carla Deck6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMolly Stokas vs Claudia Hastings6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBradee Cicchinelli vs Kamilah Peebles Brathwaite6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesQuincy Eassa vs Jenna Stolldorf6-0, 6-0
2025-06-11vs SLAWI-WITHERSPOON/WESTPORTSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChristina Prejean vs Claudia Hastings6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDenisha Atkins vs Ashley Witherspoon2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 Singles 18+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Christina Prejean
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.88
Melissa Simmons
published
2.85
Bradee Cicchinelli
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.84
Molly Stokas
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.71
Quincy Eassa
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.57
Heidi Berkley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.52
Jennifer Haigler
published 3
2.51
2.27
Denisha Atkins
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Berkley + Bradee Cicchinelli3352% games+5.7% vs expected
Molly Stokas + Heidi Berkley314 matchesnot enough data
Molly Stokas + Quincy Eassa213 matchesnot enough data
Molly Stokas + Bradee Cicchinelli303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christina Prejean
66W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Melissa Simmons
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Bradee Cicchinelli
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Molly Stokas
38W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Quincy Eassa
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Heidi Berkley
30W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Jennifer Haigler
22W–27L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
3
Christine Rowland
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Denisha Atkins
13W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.