Teams

No Drama Mamas

Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women Delches - Tues

22 players · average NTRP 3.80 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-30vs All About the ShotsLost 14
W#1 DoublesNoelle Lachenmayer / Kim Valencia vs Jennifer Cadwalader / Kathleen Glikes7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMaureen Mahoney vs Anne Lacey1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle McCall / Kirsten McCoy vs Jennifer Kraut / Jennifer Toney3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTrish O'Brien / Khue Feigenberg vs Lois Kester / Natasha Smith1-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesMichele King / Anna Doyle vs Susan Loraine / Jessica McFarland3-6, 2-5
2026-06-09vs Hit HappyLost 23
W#1 DoublesKatie Conrad / Barbara Curran vs Jia Liu / Michele Chapman6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKhue Feigenberg vs Demi Lin2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBirgit Golz / Helena Carolin vs Veronica Fox / Jill McCormick5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLiz Lee / Maureen Boyd vs Emma Collina / Gabriella Feldman7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesNoelle Lachenmayer / Yanhong Feng vs Diane Marky / Heidi Dell'Oso0-6, 3-6
2026-06-02vs UMLY FusionLost 23
W#1 DoublesLaura Buchner / Kirsten McCoy vs Michaela Kulbartz / Virginia Lucci7-6, 2-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKhue Feigenberg vs Trish Sheff2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKim Valencia / Karen Reaume vs Karen Krane / Mary Bowler7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeong Duffy / Liz Lee vs Jen Penwell / Carol DiBari6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#4 DoublesBirgit Golz / Maureen Boyd vs Mary Byrne / Ginger McGeer3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-19vs Nicolson Spring 40+Lost 14
L#1 DoublesKatie Conrad / Barbara Curran vs Nancy Salamon / Peggy O'Dwyer6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKhue Feigenberg vs Amela Shankar1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBirgit Golz / Patricia Szipszky vs Amy Fritsch / Sandra Marcus3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Buchner / Kirsten McCoy vs Cary Jean Jefferis / Casey Benedict3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#4 DoublesNoelle Lachenmayer / Yanhong Feng vs Susan Campbell / Laura Meyer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-12vs All About the ShotsLost 23
W#1 DoublesKatie Conrad / Barbara Curran vs Elizabeth Austin / Pamela Ball7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesColleen Kramer vs Anne Lacey2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Valencia / Karen Reaume vs Krista McGrath / Renata Manning4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKirsten McCoy / Jeong Duffy vs Natasha Smith / Christine Foga6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#4 DoublesMichelle McCall / Trish O'Brien vs Lois Kester / Tina Zahran6-3, 4-5, 1-0
2026-04-28vs Hit HappyLost 05
L#1 DoublesTrish O'Brien / Patricia Szipszky vs Michele Chapman / Jia Liu1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMaureen Mahoney vs Demi Lin2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Buchner / Yanhong Feng vs Rebecca Swayne / Lisa Lyons1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeong Duffy / Liz Lee vs Diane Marky / Jill McCormick5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesAnna Doyle / Michele King vs Emiko Dunwoody / Julie Senko3-6, 3-6
2026-04-21vs UMLY FusionWon 32
L#1 DoublesKatie Conrad / Kim Valencia vs Min Lubiniecki / Christina Carberry2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesColleen Kramer vs Dinali Jayanetti6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKirsten McCoy / Patricia Szipszky vs Deb Castle / Carey Gillis6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMaureen Boyd / Liz Lee vs Valerie Cheng / Andrea Shank7-6, 5-4
L#4 DoublesSuzy Dowell / Michelle McCall vs Virginia Lucci / Karen Krane3-6, 1-6
2026-04-14vs Nicolson Spring 40+Lost 13
W#1 DoublesBarbara Curran / Katie Conrad vs Nancy Salamon / Peggy O'Dwyer6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesColleen Kramer vs Amela Shankar6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNoelle Lachenmayer / Yanhong Feng vs Lisa Kitchen / Linda Hasz0-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesLiz Lee / Michelle McCall vs Dara Main / Casey Benedict6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Delches - Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Barbara Curran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Kim Valencia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.86
Katie Conrad
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #4 Doubles 18% · published
3.78
Colleen Kramer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.58
Helena Carolin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Patricia Szipszky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Jeong Duffy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Yanhong Feng
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
Liz Lee
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.44
Noelle Lachenmayer
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Birgit Golz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Kirsten McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.41
Laura Buchner
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Suzy Dowell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Trish O'Brien
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Maureen Mahoney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.22
Michelle McCall
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #4 Doubles 30% · published
2.98
Karen Reaume
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.97
Khue Feigenberg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Anna Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kate Miller
published
Maureen Boyd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Lee + Jeong Duffy7755% games+10.6% vs expected
Birgit Golz + Colleen Kramer1442% games+8.4% vs expected
Barbara Curran + Katie Conrad12561% games+8.2% vs expected
Birgit Golz + Laura Buchner2545% games+7.7% vs expected
Laura Buchner + Maureen Boyd5259% games+7.4% vs expected
Laura Buchner + Kirsten McCoy654853% games+0.5% vs expected
Liz Lee + Maureen Boyd22860% games+0.3% vs expected
Kirsten McCoy + Jeong Duffy6259% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Curran
14W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Kim Valencia
147W–74L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
Katie Conrad
124W–58L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Colleen Kramer
32W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Helena Carolin
61W–95L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Patricia Szipszky
43W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jeong Duffy
82W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Yanhong Feng
92W–102L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Liz Lee
50W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
4
Noelle Lachenmayer
76W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.44
4
Birgit Golz
25W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
4
Kirsten McCoy
104W–92L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.41
Laura Buchner
95W–88L career · 3 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Suzy Dowell
250W–131L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Trish O'Brien
38W–76L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Maureen Mahoney
62W–113L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Michelle McCall
63W–70L career · 10 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Karen Reaume
101W–91L career · 5 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Khue Feigenberg
32W–46L career · 10 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Anna Doyle
50W–66L career · 6 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
Kate Miller
13W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maureen Boyd
50W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.