Teams

LMKuran/Edgemoor

2022 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-25vs LKBUARON/PACWon 10
W#1 SinglesStacy Beardslee vs Olesia Kososki6-4, 7-5
2022-04-04vs LRSica-Sheeheen/TrumpSplit 11
W#1 SinglesStacy Beardslee vs Allison Nelin4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Turley / Mary Laliberte vs Gretchen Dascoli / Renee Sica6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2022-03-28vs LCBogojevich/CSDLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Turley / Alison Cooper vs Elizabeth Born / Patty Druzbik3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Laliberte / Donna Werner vs Kathy Ciambotti / Teresa Pal1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesErin Taaffe / Stacy Beardslee vs Helen Leonard / Christine Bogojevich0-6, 2-6
2022-03-21vs LCPeterson/EdgemoorLost 02
L#1 SinglesStacy Beardslee vs Mandy Alexander3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Kuran / Lisa Turley vs Karen Allison / Aimee Downing3-6, 0-6
2022-03-14vs LJFrye/JettonWon 10
W#1 SinglesErin Taaffe vs Brenda Kadlecik6-3, 6-4
2022-03-07vs LSMcAfee-Griffin/PeninsulaLost 02
L#1 SinglesMary Laliberte vs Brooke Hondros1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Leslie Crane vs Sheila Wakeman / Sheryl Chapman6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Sheila Hebert
published
2.93
Mary Laliberte
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.92
Lisa Turley
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
Mariel Carr
published
2.80
Stacy Beardslee
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 3
2.72
Erin Taaffe
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Beth Welch
published 3
2.57
Ann Baker
published 3
Melissa Kuran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Laliberte + Lisa Turley6855% gamesnot enough data
Sheila Hebert + Lisa Turley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheila Hebert
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Mary Laliberte
96W–97L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Lisa Turley
116W–107L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
Mariel Carr
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Stacy Beardslee
117W–144L career · 11 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Erin Taaffe
69W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Beth Welch
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Ann Baker
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Melissa Kuran
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.