Teams

Millette 3.5 40+

2022 Frederick Adult 40 & Over · Frederick Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.30 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-04-27vs Reefe 3.5 40+Won 10
W#3 DoublesEunice Winfree / Kathleen Maiden vs Lori Grimaldi / Christine Hawk6-0, 6-0
2022-04-23vs Kessler 3.5 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesKathleen Maiden / Diane Carson vs Sabrina Alban / Jodie Phillips6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHEATHER HUGHES / Eunice Winfree vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-14vs Reefe 3.5 40+Split 11
L#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Kathleen Maiden vs Kathy Greene / Lori Lynn Sines4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Mansfield / Deanne Iverson vs Veronica Best / Lori Grimaldi7-5, 6-1
2022-04-12vs Kessler 3.5 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesCintya Leveque / Giselle Medina vs Sabrina Alban / Jodie Phillips6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathleen Maiden / Laura Haney vs Melissa Lepage / Deborah Dettmer6-3, 6-1
2022-04-09vs Kessler 3.5 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca Stewart / Cintya Leveque vs Meghan Meade / Jennifer Albers6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGiselle Medina / Suzanne Krudys vs Kimberly Price / MIchelle Jeram6-1, 6-3
2022-04-04vs Reefe 3.5 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesHolly Erdely / Eunice Winfree vs Lesley Leonard / Lori Lynn Sines6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Haney / Donna Jones vs Michelle Shipley / Megan Wilhelm6-0, 6-4
2022-03-26vs Reefe 3.5 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesCintya Leveque / Suzanne Krudys vs Cathy Cunningham / Yen Nguyen6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHEATHER HUGHES / Deanne Iverson vs Veronica Best / Lori Grimaldi6-0, 6-0
2022-03-24vs Kessler 3.5 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesCintya Leveque / Suzanne Krudys vs Julia Johnson / Sabrina Alban6-3, 6-1
2022-03-21vs Reefe 3.5 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesSharon Edelstein / Eunice Winfree vs Lori Lynn Sines / Amanda Mason2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Jones / Laura Haney vs Veronica Best / Erika Gilbert6-2, 6-4
2022-03-17vs Kessler 3.5 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesGiselle Medina / Suzanne Krudys vs Jodie Phillips / Sabrina Alban6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDeanne Iverson / Sharon Edelstein vs Jennifer Wheat / Mary Beth Herrera6-4, 6-2
2022-03-10vs Reefe 3.5 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMillette Miller / Laura Haney vs Lori Lynn Sines / Amy LaMoure0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Erdely / Kathleen Maiden vs Teresa Reefe / Jamia Arner1-6, 2-6
2022-03-05vs Kessler 3.5 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesLaura Haney / Giselle Medina vs Jodie Phillips / Sabrina Alban6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCintya Leveque vs Trisha Kinman6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Deanne Iverson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Cintya Leveque
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.42
Rebecca Stewart
published
3.33
Suzanne Krudys
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Diane Carson
published 3.5
3.19
Leslie Mansfield
published
3.11
Giselle Medina
published 3.5
3.08
Holly Erdely
published 3.5
3.06
HEATHER HUGHES
published 3
3.05
Kathleen Maiden
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.04
Eunice Winfree
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
Loan Nguyen
published
Millette Miller
published
Valerie Pierce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Krudys + Giselle Medina2451% games+2.3% vs expected
Suzanne Krudys + Kathleen Maiden4359% gamesnot enough data
Laura Haney + Cintya Leveque134 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Krudys + Cintya Leveque213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deanne Iverson
165W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Cintya Leveque
299W–233L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
Rebecca Stewart
36W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Suzanne Krudys
152W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Diane Carson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Leslie Mansfield
36W–23L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Giselle Medina
28W–27L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Holly Erdely
78W–102L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
HEATHER HUGHES
52W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Kathleen Maiden
106W–188L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Eunice Winfree
80W–78L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
Loan Nguyen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Valerie Pierce
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.