Teams

RCCB - Simmons

2023 Brevard Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.06 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesZachary Eichholz / Cynthia Simmons vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-08vs Suntree - HonakerWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Husty / Zachary Eichholz vs Yvette van der Wiel / David Carver6-0, 6-0
2023-06-13vs Brevard/Flores/Mixed18&Over8.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesKatie Husty / Zachary Eichholz vs Larissa Kiyoku / Luiz Traversin6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMarcia Lusk / Michael Veal vs Naomi Coleman / Daniel Flores4-6, 1-6
2023-06-06vs Suntree - HonakerLost 02
L#1 DoublesZachary Eichholz / Katie Husty vs Christina Carver / Thomas Tolles2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Deguibert / Rima Campbell vs Brandon Ledene / Jennifer Ledene2-6, 3-6
2023-05-30vs Fee - BadrakWon 10
W#1 DoublesZachary Eichholz / Katie Husty vs Shannel Smith / Kevin Badrak6-0, 6-3
2023-05-23vs Brevard/Flores/Mixed18&Over8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Husty / Zachary Eichholz vs Michelle Smith / Jacob Kargauer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-16vs Suntree - HonakerLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie Husty / Michael Veal vs Jill Mignogna / William Honaker6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Zachary Eichholz
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.08
Maegan Hulscher
published 4
3.99
Marcia Lusk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Katie Husty
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.84
Elliott Hulscher
published 4
3.79
Terry Taylor
published
3.74
Isidro Zavaleta
published 4
3.46
Rima Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.21
Cynthia Simmons
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maegan Hulscher + Elliott Hulscher23459% games−7.0% vs expected
Katie Husty + Zachary Eichholz4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Zachary Eichholz
83W–46L career · 11 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
4
Maegan Hulscher
139W–50L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
4.08
4.5
Marcia Lusk
74W–74L career · 1 line in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Katie Husty
90W–32L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Elliott Hulscher
89W–52L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Terry Taylor
25W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Isidro Zavaleta
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Rima Campbell
63W–44L career · 1 line in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Cynthia Simmons
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.