Teams

BBTC Knight

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over-GC · Women 5.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs TOCC-MitchellLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Knight / Rachel Gillenwater vs Toni Fillmore / Holly French6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCourtney Zitterkopf / Carrie Fish vs Mary Brumley / Lindsey OConnell1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarlo Stewart / Adrianne Jones vs Gina Kostal / JEN INMAN2-6, 3-6
2026-08-10vs Diamondhead PowellLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fish / Rachel Gillenwater vs Eliza Easton / Christina Milner6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie Baughman / Meggan Stolarski vs Arianne Poole / Keelia Bienemy3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPam Berdine / Marlo Stewart vs Rebecca Powell / Penny Edwards2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-28vs Biloxi- LyonsLost 02
L#1 DoublesShirley Brehm / Courtney Zitterkopf vs Kim Lyons / Jennifer Mitchell5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Knight / Marlo Stewart vs Cynthia Baggett / Sabine Pierre5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOCC-Mitchell2042552
2BBTC Knight02151168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Laurie Baughman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Shirley Brehm
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Adrianne Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Lynn Hebert
published
2.56
Carrie Fish
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.40
Pam Berdine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Rachel Gillenwater
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Diane Field
published 2.5
2.02
Elan Buckley
published
1.99
Courtney Zitterkopf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.73
Marlo Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Meggan Stolarski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Hebert + Pam Berdine3549% games+6.4% vs expected
Adrianne Jones + Marlo Stewart033 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Gillenwater + Marlo Stewart033 matchesnot enough data
Pam Berdine + Marlo Stewart213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Baughman
22W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
Shirley Brehm
46W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.66
3
Adrianne Jones
6W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Lynn Hebert
12W–14L career · no lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
3
Carrie Fish
7W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Pam Berdine
17W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.40
Rachel Gillenwater
8W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Diane Field
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Elan Buckley
11W–28L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Courtney Zitterkopf
0W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Marlo Stewart
3W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.73
Meggan Stolarski
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.