Teams

IHCC-HILL

2023 MATA Tri-Level 18 & Over - Spring · 2.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Haley Yarbrough
published
3.52
Evelyn Bickley
published
3.50
Kelli Hill
published
3.46
Brooke Golubow
published 3.5
2.94
Anna Sharpton
published 3
2.89
Lori Prine
published
2.69
Katie Garvin
published
2.67
Mary Woodward
published
2.67
Liz Hill
published
2.67
Teresa HURT
published
2.58
Mary Katz
published
2.41
Marcelina Easom
published
2.38
Nancy Long
published
Judy Ennis
published
Manoela Milanez
published
Melanie Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Katz + Nancy Long0527% games−20.3% vs expected
Judy Ennis + Mary Katz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Haley Yarbrough
22W–8L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Evelyn Bickley
19W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.52
Kelli Hill
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Brooke Golubow
7W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3
Anna Sharpton
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Lori Prine
17W–22L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.89
Katie Garvin
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Mary Woodward
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Liz Hill
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
Teresa HURT
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
Mary Katz
4W–29L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.58
Marcelina Easom
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.41
Nancy Long
1W–20L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.38
Judy Ennis
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Manoela Milanez
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Wilson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.