Teams

CDTA W 18&OW4.5 3.Lake Bluff Cal Sat 4 $20

CDTA 2Winter 18 & Over W · E

17 players · average NTRP 4.42 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
L#1 DoublesKatharine Cole / Kristen Kalinka vs Kim Richards / Sue DeMari6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShana Cal / Jena Lindstrom vs Leslie McClure / Lisa Kuchar6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCatherine Grover / Kristen Kalinka vs Ilinca Williams / Jenna Reisch1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSarah Paulson / Jena Lindstrom vs Ayano Nakamura / Mary Therese Lee3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-20vs CDTA A18&O 4.5W River Trails WrightSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnna Campbell / Sarah Paulson vs Marialin Lomongo / Ayano Nakamura1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesClaire Buehler / Kristen Kalinka vs Mary Therese Lee / Alison Donnelly6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesClaire Buehler / Jena Lindstrom vs Kerry Nowicki / Christine Meade6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlexandria Bear / Shana Cal vs Rachel Corrough / Kristy Sweigard6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesSarah Paulson / Kristen Kalinka vs Christine Campanelli / Sheryl Albert7-6, 6-5
L#1 DoublesShana Cal / Anna Campbell vs Elaine Ni / Ashley Martin4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKatharine Cole / Kristen Kalinka vs Amanda Ellsworth / Heike Spahn7-6, 5-4
W#1 DoublesAlexandria Bear / Meghan Posnanski vs Lisa Musgrave / Olga Ovnanyan6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKristen Kalinka / Anna Campbell vs Keara Miller / Alice Copland3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesAnna Campbell / Sarah Paulson vs Kim Richards / Kathleen Preston7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAnna Campbell vs Monika Nalepa6-1, 6-5
L#3 DoublesKatharine Cole / Catherine Grover vs Amy Brodsky / Marinne Leonard3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKatharine Cole / Anna Campbell vs Sheryl Albert / Lisa Rosen7-6, 0-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesClaire Buehler / Kristen Kalinka vs Cara Waddle / Desiree Witte6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA A18&O 4.5W River Trails Wright113381847408
2CDTA W 18&OW4.5 3.Lake Bluff Cal Sat 4 $20113342248446
3CDTA W 18&OW4.5 4.Centennial Burns Sun 3 $2095302659469
4CDTA W 18&OW4.5 2.Naperville Richards Sat 6 $2286322456458
5CDTA W 18&OW4.5 5.Naperville Dunn Sat 4 $2277282863492
6CDTA W 18&OW4.5 7.Centennial Miller Fri 7:30 $2059233374534
7CDTA W 18&OW4.5 1.MT Bann Fishleder Sat 4 $25311203676540
8CDTA W 18&OW4.5 8.Score Kamel Sun 3 $20212193779568

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Claire Buehler
published 4.5
4.27
Emily Shamrock
published 4.5
4.26
Mary DaVanti
published 4.5
Alexandria Bear
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Catherine Grover
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Katharine Cole
published 4.5
4.21
Meghan Posnanski
published 4.5
4.08
Kimberly Horberg
published 4.5
4.07
Shana Cal
published 4.5
3.94
Kristen Kalinka
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.94
Haina Shin
published 4
3.92
Pamela Blumenthal
published 4.5
Anna Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
Erin Alvarez
published
Giang Bui
published
Jena Lindstrom
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Paulson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Buehler + Jena Lindstrom7161% games+17.9% vs expected
Shana Cal + Meghan Posnanski6551% games+4.0% vs expected
Alexandria Bear + Meghan Posnanski5651% games+3.7% vs expected
Claire Buehler + Mary DaVanti4449% games−1.6% vs expected
Shana Cal + Mary DaVanti6254% games−1.6% vs expected
Shana Cal + Katharine Cole8655% games−3.7% vs expected
Shana Cal + Claire Buehler13954% games−6.7% vs expected
Katharine Cole + Claire Buehler6452% games−11.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Claire Buehler
115W–77L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Emily Shamrock
123W–81L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Mary DaVanti
111W–50L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Alexandria Bear
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Catherine Grover
49W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Katharine Cole
114W–68L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Meghan Posnanski
116W–72L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Kimberly Horberg
92W–28L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Shana Cal
140W–108L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
Kristen Kalinka
15W–24L career · 7 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Haina Shin
200W–104L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
4.5
Pamela Blumenthal
33W–58L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Anna Campbell
8W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Erin Alvarez
46W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Giang Bui
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jena Lindstrom
34W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Paulson
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.