Teams

Lucky Losers 3.5M Singles

2023 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-23vs High on Tennis 3.5M SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKwangsoo Jeon vs Gabriel Silverman2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJarey Wang vs Jon Roll6-2, 6-0
2023-10-20vs NetSuccess 3.5M SinglesWon 20
W#2 SinglesKwangsoo Jeon vs Shaojie Chen6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDooheon Ghim vs Richard Briggs6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-17vs High on Tennis 3.5M SinglesSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKwangsoo Jeon vs Mehdy Sedaghat Payam6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJarey Wang vs Chris Takiar2-6, 6-7
2023-10-16vs I'd Hit That 3.5M SinglesWon 20
W#2 SinglesDooheon Ghim vs Niraj Jani1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKwangsoo Jeon vs Vince Giuliana6-4, 5-2
2023-10-07vs NetSuccess 3.5M SinglesWon 20
W#2 SinglesDooheon Ghim vs David Djajaputra6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJarey Wang vs UMA SRIKUMARAN6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-10-04vs I'd Hit That 3.5M SinglesLost 01
L#3 SinglesKwangsoo Jeon vs Sridhar Atluri6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-10-03vs High on Tennis 3.5M SinglesLost 01
L#1 SinglesKwangsoo Jeon vs Keitaro Nishimura2-6, 3-6
2023-09-18vs High on Tennis 3.5M SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesJarey Wang vs Gabriel Silverman5-7, 1-5
L#2 SinglesDooheon Ghim vs Anzor Misabishvili5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Kwangsoo Jeon
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.48
Jarey Wang
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Christopher Reger
published 3.5
3.22
Dooheon Ghim
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dooheon Ghim + Kwangsoo Jeon3644% games+8.0% vs expected
Dooheon Ghim + Jarey Wang0741% gamesnot enough data
Kwangsoo Jeon + Jarey Wang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kwangsoo Jeon
140W–77L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Jarey Wang
28W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Christopher Reger
62W–59L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dooheon Ghim
68W–108L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.