Teams

Lee CCNC

2023 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 3.0 Adult Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-09vs Zumwalt - MazarickLost 01
L#3 DoublesVirginia Forbis / Cornelia Morris vs Marcela Ovalle / Melissa Parker2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-05-02vs Brooks - Pinehurst Tennis ClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesCornelia Morris / Catherine Robinette vs Renee Ference / Marianna Singer3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-04-25vs Rouse - Gates FourLost 01
L#2 DoublesMurtis Worth / Cornelia Morris vs Kathy Fick / Hannah Ha0-6, 3-6
2023-04-18vs Haugh - Highland Country ClubLost 01
L#2 SinglesCornelia Morris vs Caroline Hasty5-7, 2-6
2023-03-21vs Brooks - Pinehurst Tennis ClubWon 10
W#3 DoublesCatherine Robinette / Cornelia Morris vs Deborah Swanson / Marianna Singer6-0, 6-3
2023-03-14vs Rouse - Gates FourLost 01
L#3 DoublesCornelia Morris / Virginia Forbis vs Tammy Keller / Denise Bauer Frazier6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-07vs Haugh - Highland Country ClubWon 10
W#3 DoublesCatherine Robinette / Cornelia Morris vs Mary Haugh / Serriah Ciccone6-2, 6-1
2023-02-28vs Zumwalt - MazarickLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Fincher / Cornelia Morris vs Lauren Blashford / LaJune Ray6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Leigh Carter
published
3.43
Caroline Parks
published 3.5
2.96
Donna Hicks
published
2.94
Murtis Worth
published
2.93
Louise Lucas
published
2.91
Jennifer Fincher
published
2.78
Virginia Forbis
published
2.77
Meagan Lee
published
2.73
Cornelia Morris
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.71
Elizabeth Oettinger
published
2.67
Pamela Gantt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louise Lucas + Cornelia Morris033 matchesnot enough data
Cornelia Morris + Catherine Robinette123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Carter
29W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Caroline Parks
33W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Donna Hicks
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Murtis Worth
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Louise Lucas
8W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jennifer Fincher
18W–26L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.91
Virginia Forbis
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Meagan Lee
12W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cornelia Morris
51W–70L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Elizabeth Oettinger
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Catherine Robinette
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Pamela Gantt
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.