Teams

Anderson/Scheer

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 40 & OVER · Women 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-25vs Davidson 7.5 40+Won 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Scheer / Darlene Satifka vs Michelle Sahlie / Betty Mahoney7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStacey Anderson / Cara DAngelo vs Joelle Crocker / Amy Messier6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Holly / Hilary Cole vs Christine Tryer / Deborah Dreher6-1, 6-2
2026-08-20vs Godfrey/MilkesLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Holly / Joy Muczko vs Barbara Pennington / Linda McKinney6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCara DAngelo / Lynne Loccisano vs Becky Farris / Anne Milkes6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLori Kalan / Trisha Kelley vs Debbie Trafton / Lisa Keeton4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Darlene Satifka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Barbara Caropolo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Lori Kalan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Cara DAngelo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Nancy Utz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Liz Govoni
published
3.29
Trisha Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Kelly Scheer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Melissa Huffman
published
3.19
Kristina Marchisin
published
Joy Muczko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lynne Loccisano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Holly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Scheer + Kristina Marchisin1448% games−6.9% vs expected
Melissa Huffman + Kristina Marchisin314 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Utz + Melissa Huffman303 matchesnot enough data
Liz Govoni + Melissa Huffman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Satifka
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Barbara Caropolo
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.64
Lori Kalan
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Cara DAngelo
30W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Nancy Utz
38W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Liz Govoni
23W–5L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Trisha Kelley
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Kelly Scheer
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Melissa Huffman
23W–10L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Kristina Marchisin
16W–9L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Joy Muczko
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lynne Loccisano
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Holly
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.