Teams

WI Tri-Level Omega Men NEL Valley Addo

2024 WI Tri Level · WI Tri-Level Omega Doubles Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesScott Niemi / Noah Hlavac vs Nathan Barash / Adam Hawley6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSteve Petrinski / Alex Christianson vs Jeffrey Saeger / Ian Sewell5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTung Ouy / Pramod Shinde vs Brian Spaeth / David Gahagan6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesScott Niemi / Noah Hlavac vs Nathan Barash / Adam Hawley6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIvor Addo / Alex Christianson vs Jeffrey Saeger / Ian Sewell4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTung Ouy / Tayler Roal vs Todd Hammond / Brian Spaeth6-3, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMichael McGuire / Zach Janssen vs Adam Hawley / Robert Downey6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesIvor Addo / Steve Petrinski vs Jeffrey Saeger / Ian Sewell6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTayler Roal / Vincent Clune vs Todd Hammond / David Gahagan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesZach Janssen / Michael McGuire vs Robert Downey / Nathan Barash6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesIvor Addo / Steve Petrinski vs Kunal Patel / John Casper3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVincent Clune / Pramod Shinde vs Brian Spaeth / Todd Hammond6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Tri-Level Omega Doubles Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Tri-Level Omega Men NEL Valley Addo4093989
2WI Tri-Level Omega Men NEL Oshkosh Hammond043920132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Christianson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Steve Petrinski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Pramod Shinde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ivor Addo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Noah Hlavac
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Niemi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tayler Roal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tung Ouy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vincent Clune
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Zach Janssen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Petrinski + Ivor Addo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Christianson
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Petrinski
42W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Pramod Shinde
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Ivor Addo
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Noah Hlavac
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Niemi
15W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tayler Roal
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tung Ouy
53W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vincent Clune
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zach Janssen
22W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.