Teams

NPike-HVCC

2025 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-07vs DHostetler-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Pike / Susan Peak vs Martha Schulwitz / Marcella Bria6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Davidson / Susan Hayes vs Laurie Truschel / Doris Stam4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarjorie Pierson / Laurie Myer vs Claire Bassett / June Mader4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Jennifer Pyle
published
3.14
Joan Mueller
published
3.09
Nancy Pike
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Ruth Caccavale
published
3.08
Elisabeth Wiener
published
3.03
Deborah Hertzog
published 3
3.03
Thekla Pappas
published
2.94
Carolyn Davidson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Laurie Myer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Mary Grigg
published
Beth Sholtz
published 3
2.46
Susan Peak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marjorie Pierson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Pyle
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Joan Mueller
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Nancy Pike
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Ruth Caccavale
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Elisabeth Wiener
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
3
Deborah Hertzog
24W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Thekla Pappas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.03
3
Carolyn Davidson
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Laurie Myer
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Mary Grigg
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Beth Sholtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Peak
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.46
Marjorie Pierson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.