Teams

OC Los Cab - Tracy

2026 Adult Capstone League · Women's 5.0 Plus Capstone

15 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-12vs OC LPC - MouttapaWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela Hendy / Kathy Archibald vs So-Young Walsh / Dana Kim6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesFarrah Northcott / Trina Eggers vs Amy Thompson / Jinna Johnson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracy Harris / Alissa Ahlman vs Vicky Blanco / Julie Bo6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-22vs OC LPC - MouttapaWon 21
W#1 DoublesSanem Ahearn / Amy Caldwell vs Mandi Collier / Stephanie Ellis6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathy Archibald / Eleanor Hammargren vs Jennifer Uyeda / Melissa Rosenthal6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Beindorf / Karen Haas vs TRAM LY / Megan Riley4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-01vs OC LPC - MouttapaWon 21
W#1 DoublesIsabelle Benoit / Kathryn Settles vs Julie Mulrooney / Melissa Rosenthal6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Caldwell / Trina Eggers vs Jennifer Uyeda / Karen Char6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTracy Harris / Karen Haas vs Amy Thompson / Masami Hashimoto2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-22vs OC LPC - MouttapaWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Caldwell / Anja Clarke vs Julie Mulrooney / Diana Angell6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEleanor Hammargren / Trina Eggers vs Dana Kim / So-Young Walsh7-6, 2-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Archibald / Alissa Ahlman vs Anne Nicholson / TRAM LY6-2, 6-2
2026-02-15vs OC LPC - MouttapaWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Archibald / Jennifer Beindorf vs Julie Mulrooney / Michele Mouttapa6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDanielle Friedman / Isabelle Benoit vs Margaret Chang / Dana Kim6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTracy Harris / Anja Clarke vs Anne Nicholson / Masami Hashimoto7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2026-02-08vs OC LPC - MouttapaWon 21
W#1 DoublesIsabelle Benoit / Kathryn Settles vs Karen Char / Jennifer Uyeda6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesFarrah Northcott / Eleanor Hammargren vs Melissa Rosenthal / Laura McManus3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Archibald / Alissa Ahlman vs Stephanie Ellis / Michele Mouttapa6-1, 6-0
2026-01-25vs OC LPC - MouttapaWon 30
W#1 DoublesDanielle Friedman / Angela Hendy vs Jinna Johnson / Mandi Collier6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesIsabelle Benoit / Kathryn Settles vs Julie Bo / Margaret Chang6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEleanor Hammargren / Dianne Matias vs Laura McManus / Megan Riley6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women's 5.0 Plus Capstone
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Los Cab - Tracy7018310118
2OC LPC - Mouttapa0731838236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.70 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.03
Kathy Archibald
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
5.03
Kathryn Settles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.99
Angela Hendy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5.5
4.93
Sanem Ahearn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.92
Anja Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.82
Isabelle Benoit
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.80
Dianne Matias
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.75
Danielle Friedman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.64
Eleanor Hammargren
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.61
Jennifer Beindorf
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.57
Farrah Northcott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.50
Trina Eggers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.36
Alissa Ahlman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Moira O'Toole
published
4.26
Karen Haas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Archibald + Eleanor Hammargren4164% games+4.9% vs expected
Isabelle Benoit + Kathryn Settles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Archibald
17W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
5.03
Kathryn Settles
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
5.03
5.5
Angela Hendy
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
4.99
Sanem Ahearn
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.93
5
Anja Clarke
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.92
Isabelle Benoit
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Dianne Matias
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Danielle Friedman
4W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.75
Eleanor Hammargren
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.64
Jennifer Beindorf
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.61
Farrah Northcott
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.57
5
Trina Eggers
33W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.50
4.5
Alissa Ahlman
28W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
4.36
Moira O'Toole
11W–12L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
Karen Haas
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.