Teams

SDNC NLT RPTC/ Lovering

2024 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WD Summer- SDNC · SDNC Women (3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-14vs SDNC LLW NLT Santaluz/ WagnerWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathy Pahler / Richelle Gaceta vs Chrystal Meyer / Clara Justus6-2, 7-6
2024-08-07vs SDNC LLW NLT Santaluz/ WagnerWon 10
W#3 DoublesGiulia Cardano / Mimi Kim vs Chrystal Meyer / Clara Justus6-2, 6-0
2024-07-24vs SDNC NLT Lomas Santa Fe/ TrussoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJenn Lau / Jennifer DeBiasi vs Julie Parker / Monica Burnett4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMimi Kim / Richelle Gaceta vs Donna Golden / Meredith Vytopil6-4, 6-3
2024-07-03vs SDNC LLW NLT Santaluz/ WagnerLost 01
L#3 DoublesMimi Kim / Giulia Cardano vs Marcela Flores / Christina MacIer4-6, 0-6
2024-06-26vs SDNC NLT Lomas Santa Fe/ TrussoLost 01
L#3 DoublesRichelle Gaceta / Carolyn Shea vs Kerri Giesen / Catherine Martin5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Women (3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Lori Lovering
published 3.5
3.17
Jenn Lau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Terri Oates
published
2.99
Mimi Kim
published
2.91
Diane Severson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Richelle Gaceta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Giulia Cardano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Jennifer DeBiasi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Giulia Cardano + Richelle Gaceta213 matchesnot enough data
Giulia Cardano + Mimi Kim213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lori Lovering
47W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Jenn Lau
45W–38L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Terri Oates
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.17
Mimi Kim
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Diane Severson
43W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Richelle Gaceta
48W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Giulia Cardano
42W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
Jennifer DeBiasi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.