Monte Gray
2022 SPRING FLEX SINGLES · Men's Flex Singles
1 player · average NTRP — / IDAHO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Flight standings30 teams · Men's Flex Singles
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Richard Bitton | 8 | 2 | 5 | 77 |
| 2Philip Jones | 6 | 1 | 4 | 57 |
| 3Leif Tapanila | 6 | 4 | 11 | 85 |
| 4Alin Suru | 5 | 3 | 6 | 68 |
| 5Seiji Wood | 4 | 2 | 4 | 41 |
| 6Shawn Oram | 4 | 3 | 6 | 55 |
| 7Pat Gates | 4 | 4 | 8 | 54 |
| 8Noah Wang | 4 | 4 | 11 | 86 |
| 9Jesse Curtis | 4 | 5 | 11 | 76 |
| 10David Brake | 4 | 5 | 11 | 87 |
| 11Brendan McGeehan | 4 | 6 | 14 | 89 |
| 12Nathan Richardson | 3 | 4 | 8 | 60 |
| 13Chuck Dickerson | 3 | 5 | 11 | 82 |
| 14Marcus Andrews | 3 | 6 | 12 | 81 |
| 15Josh Ellis | 3 | 6 | 12 | 85 |
| 16Brett Carlsen | 3 | 6 | 13 | 93 |
| 17Joe Andersen | 3 | 7 | 14 | 104 |
| 18Tim Flicker | 3 | 7 | 16 | 106 |
| 19Howard Hansen | 2 | 5 | 11 | 69 |
| 20Sam Snell | 2 | 6 | 13 | 89 |
| 21Zac Gershberg | 2 | 7 | 14 | 100 |
| 22James Hickey | 2 | 8 | 16 | 107 |
| 23TJ Merzlock | 1 | 6 | 13 | 78 |
| 24Tom Chambers | 1 | 7 | 14 | 90 |
| 25Sam Beckstead | 1 | 8 | 17 | 106 |
| 26Elias Bisharat | 0 | 7 | 14 | 84 |
| 27Eric Devenburg | 0 | 7 | 14 | 84 |
| 28Travis Stone | 0 | 7 | 14 | 84 |
| 29Monte Gray | 0 | 7 | 14 | 84 |
| 30Doug Lindley | 0 | 8 | 16 | 96 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.