Teams

Elevate

Men's Interclub · Summer 2026 Interclub

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-07-01Lost 01
L#2 Male DoublesPeter Smith / Adam Ast vs C Thomas Hogge / Michael Moran6-4, 3-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Summer 2026 Interclub
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SFTC - Lee6116511129
2SFTC - Wallenstein5216510112
3Elevate5212922197
4Drumlins -Moran1661534259
5Drumlins - Mone1742041278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Kyle Voyer
usually #1 Male Doubles 92%, also #2 Male Doubles 8% · published 3.5
3.01
Peter Smith
usually #2 Male Doubles 100% · published
Adam Ast
usually #2 Male Doubles 86%, also #1 Male Singles 14% · published
Edward Darling
published
Jesse Daino
usually #1 Male Singles 71%, also #1 Male Doubles 14% · published
Kevin Seymour
published
Michael Hutchinson
published
Steve Pekich
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kyle Voyer
117W–50L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Peter Smith
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Adam Ast
2W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Edward Darling
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jesse Daino
22W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Seymour
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Hutchinson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Pekich
1W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.