Teams

Druid Hills (Alyse Ramer)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Fong Huang) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Lena Murphy
published
3.83
Robin Madley
published
3.81
Sara Eden
published
3.79
Kimberly Shuman
published
Andrea Cafarelli
published 4
3.71
Molly Malone
published
3.60
Lane Carter
published
3.59
Shannon Kettering
published
3.59
Emily Samai
published
3.55
Vaishali Puckett
published
3.52
Alyse Ramer
published 3.5
3.47
Kristen Smith-Vaniz
published
3.41
Hayley Edwards
published
Deborah Kazamias
published 3.5
Jane Armes
published
Jennifer Conway
published
Kristy Campbell
published
Marci Nessing
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyse Ramer + Kristy Campbell4354% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Kettering + Kristy Campbell5160% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Shuman + Lena Murphy5088% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Kettering + Alyse Ramer044 matchesnot enough data
Alyse Ramer + Kristen Smith-Vaniz134 matchesnot enough data
Robin Madley + Alyse Ramer213 matchesnot enough data
Alyse Ramer + Lane Carter213 matchesnot enough data
Molly Malone + Hayley Edwards213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lena Murphy
26W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
Robin Madley
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Sara Eden
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Kimberly Shuman
51W–20L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Andrea Cafarelli
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Malone
18W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.71
Lane Carter
23W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
Shannon Kettering
16W–26L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Emily Samai
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
Vaishali Puckett
21W–10L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Alyse Ramer
32W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Kristen Smith-Vaniz
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Hayley Edwards
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Deborah Kazamias
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Armes
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Conway
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristy Campbell
23W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marci Nessing
18W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.