Teams

JTerrell 55+

2022 Cap Mixed 55 & over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-03vs PSteele/Brier Creek 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesLori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen vs Mitch Strobin / Virgina Wilson6-3, 6-3
2022-08-02vs WWeisWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen vs John van Campen / Linda Carroll6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEdward Poyo / Beverly Rubin vs John Parham / Jennifer Troch6-3, 6-3
2022-07-19vs CConzola 55+ 7.0 MixedWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdward Poyo / Beverly Rubin vs David Swann / Takako Schenberger6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-12vs JKerznerWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Robert Jackson vs Christine Subasic / Shawn Subasic6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-30vs JFOGLEMANWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen vs Deanna Drescher / John Pickard6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEdward Poyo / Beverly Rubin vs Alison Bernhardt / Reginald B Gillespie Jr6-4, 6-4
2022-06-28Won 20
W#1 DoublesLori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen vs Martha Zurawel / Mark Zurawel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Robert Jackson vs Lesa Edwards / James Holmes6-1, 6-0
2022-06-21vs JNance55Won 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Jackson / Beverly Rubin vs Lance Jansen / Theresa Rosario-Jansen6-3, 6-3
2022-06-07vs CZimmermanWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen vs April Lyon / Larry Essary6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEdward Poyo / Susana Harvey vs Susan Hackman / Todd Blevins6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Roger Hatlen
published
3.77
Noelle Jackson
published
3.77
Susana Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.69
Lori Hatlen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Arthur Rubin
published 3.5
3.36
Edward Poyo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Helen Harris
published 3.5
2.72
Beverly Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Julian Barnes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Hatlen + Lori Hatlen1943% games−14.9% vs expected
Susana Harvey + Edward Poyo7075% gamesnot enough data
Beverly Rubin + Edward Poyo4159% gamesnot enough data
Arthur Rubin + Beverly Rubin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roger Hatlen
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Noelle Jackson
16W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Susana Harvey
402W–157L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%2%98%
3.77
4
Lori Hatlen
137W–170L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Arthur Rubin
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Edward Poyo
145W–62L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Helen Harris
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3
Beverly Rubin
85W–106L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
Julian Barnes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.