Teams

40+ 3.5 Terminetters

2026 Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-29vs Net AssetsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Garawski / Viet Shelton vs Jonathan Marcus / John Lee7-5, 5-2
L#1 SinglesNeeraj Gupta vs Orlando Delgado1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHenry Smith / Bryan Daguiar vs Marc Sendich / Thomas McCrary1-6, 3-6
2026-03-28vs Chip N ChargeLost 03
L#1 DoublesTimothy Brown / Viet Shelton vs James Rowe / Jeffrey Santos2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesNeeraj Gupta vs Shawn Drury3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEDWARD CHATTERS / Doug Wilson vs Matthew Warren / Eric Grace1-6, 1-6
2026-03-08vs BreakersLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Garawski / Bennett Stackhouse vs Jon Anders / Andras Teleki6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNeeraj Gupta vs Peter Gwynn-Sackson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBryan Daguiar / Doug Wilson vs Bill Hartman / Tim McNamara1-6, 0-6
2026-03-06vs DC Tennis ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesRaheen Crippen / Neeraj Gupta vs Charles Davant / William Bryan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBennett Stackhouse vs Eric Paisner7-6, 0-2
L#2 DoublesEDWARD CHATTERS / Henry Smith vs Andy Clark / Charles Hutchison1-6, 1-6
2026-03-01vs DC Tennis ClubLost 03
L#1 DoublesBryan Daguiar / Bennett Stackhouse vs Charles Davant / Mitchell Miller3-6, 1-5
L#1 SinglesScott Whittaker vs Eric Paisner1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRaheen Crippen / EDWARD CHATTERS vs Andy Clark / Charles Hutchison5-7, 1-4
2026-02-15vs MAJR WinnersWon 30
W#1 DoublesViet Shelton / Neeraj Gupta vs Brad Haywood / Atef Dahshan7-6, 3-1
W#1 SinglesBennett Stackhouse vs Roland Harris6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRaheen Crippen / Timothy Brown vs Roy Ingram / Andreas Storz6-3, 6-2
2026-01-24vs Bjorn's BorgsLost 02
L#1 DoublesDoug Wilson / Henry Smith vs Gerald Anekwe / Christopher Banks3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRaheen Crippen vs Malcolm Magee2-6, 3-6
2026-01-18vs Net AssetsLost 03
L#1 DoublesBryan Daguiar / Michael Garawski vs Marc Sendich / David Viar3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNeeraj Gupta vs Jorge Gastelumendi2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHenry Smith / EDWARD CHATTERS vs Orlando Delgado / Daniel Morris0-6, 0-6
2026-01-11vs BreakersLost 12
L#1 DoublesViet Shelton / Scott Whittaker vs Peter Gwynn-Sackson / Terry Tate1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBennett Stackhouse vs Michael Wasser6-4, 4-2
L#2 DoublesBryan Daguiar / Michael Garawski vs Jon Anders / Tim McNamara2-6, 3-6
2026-01-04vs Chip N ChargeLost 12
L#1 DoublesBennett Stackhouse / Timothy Brown vs Christopher Graves / James Rowe2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesScott Whittaker vs Eric Grace6-3, 4-4
L#2 DoublesEDWARD CHATTERS / Doug Wilson vs Hector Vargas / Kevin Hudak2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MAJR Winners01092139292
240+ 3.5 Terminetters01092144311

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Bennett Stackhouse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Scott Whittaker
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Viet Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Michael Garawski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Neeraj Gupta
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Raheen Crippen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Doug Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.94
Bryan Daguiar
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.79
Desmond LaMar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Henry Smith
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
EDWARD CHATTERS
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Timothy Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Daguiar + Desmond LaMar6355% games+10.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bennett Stackhouse
23W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Scott Whittaker
30W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Viet Shelton
42W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Michael Garawski
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Neeraj Gupta
18W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Raheen Crippen
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Doug Wilson
18W–11L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Bryan Daguiar
60W–67L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Desmond LaMar
101W–129L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Henry Smith
9W–24L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
EDWARD CHATTERS
21W–56L career · 10 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
2.56
Timothy Brown
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.