Teams

NOVA - Nguyen

2024 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri-Level 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.69 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2024-09-18vs Team 2 MojosWon 10
W#3 DoublesTom Ladenburg / Mike Burgoyne vs Henry Forster / Marc Short6-1, 6-4
2024-09-11vs Team 2 MojosWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaith Layous / Sheikh Ahmed vs Haider Abbud / Jan Neumann6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNathan Quan / Francisco Santos vs J Nathan / Thomas Leuba6-2, 6-3
2024-09-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesNathan Quan / Fa-Yueh Hung vs Russ Roberts / Jonathan Kim6-2, 6-2
2024-09-04vs Team 2 MojosWon 10
W#2 DoublesSheikh Ahmed / Aravind Krishna vs Thomas Berray / Rohan Raikar6-4, 6-1
2024-08-30vs Team 9 Westwood Team Fever TreeWon 10
W#1 DoublesAravind Krishna / Dhiraj Jagasia vs Oliver Lee / Jumpei Nakamura7-5, 6-3
2024-08-28vs Team 2 MojosLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaith Layous / Todd Campbell vs Rohan Wadehra / Stanley Pawlowski5-7, 2-6
2024-08-24vs Team 3 Choi- DMVWon 10
W#2 DoublesNathan Quan / Quentin Carter vs Ho Kim / Ryan Kim6-3, 6-1
2024-08-21vs Team 2 MojosSplit 11
L#2 DoublesZachary Jones / Dhiraj Jagasia vs Nicholas McMurray / Jan Neumann1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTom Ladenburg / Jagannath Chakravarty vs Haider Abbud / David Whitall6-1, 6-4
2024-08-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesJANAK MEHTA / Nathan Quan vs Jagannath Chakravarty / Rajakumar Chithambaram6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesVishnu Menon / Sheikh Ahmed vs Dan Wilmot / Jan Neumann4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-07vs Team 2 MojosSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDhiraj Jagasia / Anthony Nguyen vs Luis Giraldo / Dan Wilmot3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesQuinn Fiscus / Nathan Quan vs Geoffrey Montgomery / David Whitall6-1, 6-2
2024-08-02vs Team 6 Z's Last Chance SaloonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLuis Giraldo / Dhiraj Jagasia vs Ardavan Mesbahi / Scott Williams7-6, 5-2
W#2 DoublesNathan Quan / Brian Mead vs Christopher Armstrong / Brian Cheng6-4, 6-3
2024-07-31vs Team 2 MojosWon 10
W#3 DoublesTom Ladenburg / Mike Burgoyne vs J Nathan / Marc Short6-4, 6-3
2024-07-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesElango Rengasamy / Tom Ladenburg vs Brian Cheng / Nathaniel Quisbert6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.87
Andrew Imrie
published 5
4.75
4.50
Nathan Quan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.45
Sheikh Ahmed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Aravind Krishna
published 5
4.33
Laith Layous
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Zachary Jones
published
4.29
Vishnu Menon
published
4.26
Dhiraj Jagasia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.20
Tom Ladenburg
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.14
Jonathan Santos
published
4.14
Anthony Nguyen
published 4.5
4.06
4.01
Quinn Fiscus
published
3.84
Francisco Santos
published
Mike Burgoyne
published
Todd Campbell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jagannath Chakravarty + Tom Ladenburg303 matchesnot enough data
Dhiraj Jagasia + Zachary Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrew Imrie
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.87
Manu Balasubramanian
40W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.75
4.5
Nathan Quan
86W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.50
4.5
Sheikh Ahmed
62W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
4.45
5
Aravind Krishna
37W–48L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.36
4.5
Laith Layous
175W–114L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
4.33
Zachary Jones
28W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.30
Vishnu Menon
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
5
Dhiraj Jagasia
98W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.26
4.5
Tom Ladenburg
92W–64L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.20
Jonathan Santos
53W–23L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Anthony Nguyen
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
4.14
Jagannath Chakravarty
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Quinn Fiscus
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
Francisco Santos
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Mike Burgoyne
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Campbell
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.