Teams

6-ACombs-CCC

2024 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-19Lost 01
L#1 SinglesThuy Brooks vs Kelly Moore1-6, 0-6
2024-11-05Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAllison Oshea vs Emily Ryan4-6, 2-6
2024-10-29vs 3-MFulton-UNCWon 20
W#2 SinglesThuy Brooks vs Meghan Fulton7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAllison Oshea vs Leah Sansbury3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-22vs 7-GLoFrese-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesThuy Brooks vs Hannah Harvey3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAllison Oshea vs Leslie Jackson0-6, 1-6
2024-10-20vs 1-JYoung-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesThuy Brooks vs Karen Sonders1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Katie Elder
published
2.73
Thuy Brooks
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.60
Carolyn Krisko
published 3
2.54
Stephanie Terrey
published
2.42
Allison Oshea
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Bass
published
Liz Morris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Terrey + Allison Oshea6357% games+5.2% vs expected
Stephanie Terrey + Carolyn Krisko224 matchesnot enough data
Thuy Brooks + Allison Oshea213 matchesnot enough data
Thuy Brooks + Carolyn Krisko123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Elder
65W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3
Thuy Brooks
78W–88L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Carolyn Krisko
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.60
Stephanie Terrey
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%38%62%
2.54
2.5
Allison Oshea
35W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%74%26%
2.42
Elizabeth Bass
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Liz Morris
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.