Teams

BROADSTONE RC CW7.5B

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-04vs BROADSTONE RC CW7.5CLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaige Farrell / Sandi Ammons vs Maureen Snyder / Mary Wilson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClara Samawi / Kristine Cummings vs Carrie Grip / Ruth Ruffe2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Banihashemi / Lauren Pugh vs Mary Heller / Elaine Yap4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clara Samawi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Christine Banihashemi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Christy Wurster
published 4
3.56
Carmen Micsa
published 4
3.53
Patrice Gran
published
3.51
Paige Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Michele Andrade
published
3.43
Dedra Rodigo
published 3.5
3.42
Maritza Barrientos
published
3.41
Kristine Cummings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Pamela Keely
published
3.28
Lisa Ghisletta
published
3.26
Lauren Pugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Lisa Martucci-Gibbs
published
3.21
Sandi Ammons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Carly Singleton
published 3.5
Stephanie Sonntag
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandi Ammons + Lisa Martucci-Gibbs3354% gamesnot enough data
Dedra Rodigo + Patrice Gran303 matchesnot enough data
Christine Banihashemi + Paige Farrell123 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Cummings + Patrice Gran303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clara Samawi
0W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Christine Banihashemi
3W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Christy Wurster
17W–22L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Carmen Micsa
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Patrice Gran
25W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Paige Farrell
4W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
Michele Andrade
7W–17L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Dedra Rodigo
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Maritza Barrientos
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Kristine Cummings
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Pamela Keely
6W–24L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Lisa Ghisletta
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Lauren Pugh
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Lisa Martucci-Gibbs
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Sandi Ammons
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Carly Singleton
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Stephanie Sonntag
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.