Teams

5.5 Lady Terminetters

2025 Washington D.C. Combo · Washington D.C. Combo 5.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.80 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-16vs The Slice GirlsLost 12
W#1 DoublesAbigail Hyde / Mariana Moguel Resendiz vs Jennifer Chavez / Patricia Prince6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRuby Garrett / Beth Mechum vs Lisa Schievelbein / Wendy Harman2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesYemi Adewunmi / Ariahna Knight vs Sandra Salstrom / Emma Whipple1-6, 1-6
2025-10-12vs The Slice GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAbigail Hyde / Jasmine Boyd vs Jennifer Chavez / Wendy Harman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheila Gear Israel / Jasmine Janifer vs Kisha Clark / Patricia Prince5-7, 1-3
W#3 DoublesRuby Garrett / Heather Wilson vs Zandria Haines / Emma Whipple4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Desmond LaMar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Abigail Hyde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Danielle Chuprun
published 3
2.50
Ruby Garrett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.41
Mariana Moguel Resendiz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Jasmine Janifer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Jasmine Boyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Beth Mechum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Gina Anderson
published
2.04
Sheila Gear Israel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.89
Ariahna Knight
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lindsey Vanderdray
published
Yemi Adewunmi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Desmond LaMar
101W–129L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Abigail Hyde
4W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Danielle Chuprun
2W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruby Garrett
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Mariana Moguel Resendiz
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%73%27%
2.41
Jasmine Janifer
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Jasmine Boyd
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Beth Mechum
5W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Gina Anderson
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Sheila Gear Israel
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Ariahna Knight
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Lindsey Vanderdray
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yemi Adewunmi
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.