Teams

Tampa Palms Power Players - A. McKenna

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-07vs HCC Overserved - Borel-SaladinSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnne McKenna / Pamela Gonzalez vs Sejal Alvarez / Jenni Carroll0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKay Peterson / Jolanta Lagowski vs Lauren Erickson / Erin Braga6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-28vs FH Matchmakers - D. LinthicumWon 10
W#1 DoublesJihea Helme / Jolanta Lagowski vs Erin Lobner / Maria Karina Espinoza6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesAmy Rairigh / Pamela Gonzalez vs Sherry Peterson / Carmen Heggen4-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesJolanta Lagowski / Amy Rairigh vs Johnessa Hern / Emelia Flitman2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAnne McKenna / Pamela Gonzalez vs Marisol Cohen / Laura Bleacher7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2022-01-31vs Arbor Greene - C. VanMeterLost 01
L#1 DoublesJihea Helme / Pamela Gonzalez vs Rebecca Gaier / Denys Hubbard1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJolanta Lagowski / Jihea Helme vs Carrie Lacy / Denise Stone6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Myers / Amy Rairigh vs Limbi Yuce / Efza Turantekin7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-10vs Slice Girls - S. FarkasLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaula Link / Amy Rairigh vs Gina Lund / Melanie Baum3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJolanta Lagowski / Pamela Gonzalez vs Brittany Cooper / Suzanne Huffman2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Paula Link
published
3.00
Cille Williams
published 3
3.00
Hyun Kim
published 3
2.74
Amy Rairigh
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Colleen Lenaghan
published 3
2.61
Pamela Woodham
published
2.57
Jihea Helme
published
2.55
Roseann McNichol
published
2.41
Pamela Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.33
Anne McKenna
published 3
Jolanta Lagowski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Rairigh + Jolanta Lagowski3545% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Gonzalez + Jolanta Lagowski2446% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Gonzalez + Amy Rairigh033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Link
39W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.10
3
Cille Williams
62W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Hyun Kim
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Amy Rairigh
33W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Colleen Lenaghan
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Pamela Woodham
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Jihea Helme
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Roseann McNichol
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Pamela Gonzalez
26W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.41
3
Anne McKenna
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
2.33
Jolanta Lagowski
45W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.