Teams

LA - Different Strokes 3.5 Men

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Men 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-08vs LA - MountainGateLost 14
L#1 DoublesVincent Li / Haider Mir vs Mitchell Wong / Nathan Snyder3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJason Yeh vs Bradford Nugent2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Munoz / Emrich-Michael Perrier vs Andrew Park / Joel Hoffman2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTiffer Boucher vs Matthew Schonholz0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesIsmael Pieter / Robert Tsang vs Jeff Howard / Gerald Ford7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-31vs LA - MulhollandLost 23
L#1 DoublesEmrich-Michael Perrier / Fady Ruiz vs Steven Frank / Jon Kraft0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLuke Strickler vs Raffi Aharonian6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAce Kieffer / Zicong Wang vs Norman Arnold / Chad Ludwig6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJason Yeh vs Ethan Goldman4-6
W#3 DoublesJonny Woods / Vincent Li vs Samir Mohajer / Niccolo Valerio6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Luke Strickler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Ace Kieffer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Emrich-Michael Perrier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Fady Ruiz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Haider Mir
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ismael Pieter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Yeh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Jonny Woods
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Tsang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tiffer Boucher
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Vincent Li
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Zicong Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luke Strickler
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Ace Kieffer
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Emrich-Michael Perrier
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Fady Ruiz
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Haider Mir
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ismael Pieter
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jason Yeh
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonny Woods
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert Tsang
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tiffer Boucher
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vincent Li
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zicong Wang
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.