Teams

MATA/Rodney Wilson

2025 · 2026 MATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter Thursday Nights

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-29vs HOCO-JONESLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Forsyth / Mercy Forsyth vs Greg Landa / Emma Warren3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Smith / Terrie Hastings vs Nick Buccelli / Kiara Laurent2-6, 4-6
2026-01-22vs HOCO-JONESSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Forsyth / Mercy Forsyth vs Nick Buccelli / Stephanie Carlson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Hastings / Sorita Ann Carter vs Harnish Trivedi / Kiara Laurent1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJeff Dehem / Terrie Hastings vs William Silva / Kiara Laurent6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2025-12-11vs HOCO-JONESLost 01
L#3 DoublesScott Hastings / Kim Carter vs Harnish Trivedi / Rolonda Gaskins4-6, 2-6
2025-12-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Forsyth / Mercy Forsyth vs William Silva / LaVella Head6-3, 6-4
2025-11-20vs HOCO-JONESLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Carter / Terrie Hastings vs Nick Buccelli / Stephanie Carlson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2026 MATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter Thursday Nights
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MATA/Rodney Wilson5212920164

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Stacy Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 23%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
3.49
Bill Brett
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Jan Slocumb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Mercy Forsyth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Kim Carter
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Rodney Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Jeff Dehem
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.20
Michael Forsyth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Mary Beth Hand
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.12
Sorita Ann Carter
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.10
Scott Hastings
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Terrie Hastings
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rob Crain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Carter + Jeff Dehem4160% games+3.9% vs expected
Rodney Wilson + Stacy Byrd4451% games−4.8% vs expected
Rodney Wilson + Rob Crain2355% gamesnot enough data
Scott Hastings + Jeff Dehem224 matchesnot enough data
Mercy Forsyth + Michael Forsyth134 matchesnot enough data
Rodney Wilson + Jan Slocumb213 matchesnot enough data
Jan Slocumb + Bill Brett213 matchesnot enough data
Scott Hastings + Michael Forsyth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacy Byrd
66W–38L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Bill Brett
20W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Jan Slocumb
48W–27L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
Mercy Forsyth
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Kim Carter
20W–40L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Rodney Wilson
36W–52L career · 20 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
Jeff Dehem
18W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Michael Forsyth
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Mary Beth Hand
17W–17L career · 13 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Sorita Ann Carter
22W–11L career · 12 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Scott Hastings
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Terrie Hastings
1W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Rob Crain
16W–16L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.