Teams

LATA18/KESTES/LCTC

2025 Combo 18 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 8.5

20 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-25vs LATA18/Sandifer/CTFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarlynn Musil / Sally Nguyen vs Taylor Jeffcoat / Sally Keiper6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTeri Grote / Katherine Mathis vs Donna Saleeby / Annette McCaffrey6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmanda Willoughby / Lianne Wheelock vs Staci Jackson / Raine Cherry6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-11vs LATA 18/Plyler/LCTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAbby Carpenter / Olivia Bekkala vs Kristen Stevenson Fallon / Stacey Hewson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTeri Grote / Sally Nguyen vs Miranda Heaberlin / Cathy Taylor6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristin Estes / Amy Redfield vs Aubrey Hutto / Angie Rucker2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-04vs LATA18/Sandifer/CTFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKacey Rugg / Carlynn Musil vs Francisca Chambers / Lauren Tolcher6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarlene Robinson / Katherine Mathis vs Staci Jackson / Elle Klein6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSally Nguyen / Alyssa Blanchard vs Taylor Jeffcoat / Sarah Zupon6-2, 6-3
2025-08-21vs LATA 18/Plyler/LCTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCory Hunter / Madison Conwell vs Melissa Brightbill / Jessica Gore4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Meyers / Amanda Willoughby vs Carey Wood / Brittany Hickman6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAbby Carpenter / Olivia Bekkala vs Aubrey Hutto / Angie Rucker6-1, 6-0
2025-08-14vs LATA18/Sandifer/CTFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarlynn Musil / Lisa Hamrick vs Julianne Felton / Jana Xanthakos2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Estes / Sally Nguyen vs Sally Keiper / Francisca Chambers6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTeri Grote / Katherine Mathis vs Staci Jackson / Allie Boland1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-31vs LATA 18/Plyler/LCTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKacey Rugg / Marlene Robinson vs Laura Plyler / Jessica Gore1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMadison Conwell / Amy Redfield vs Melissa Brightbill / Angie Rucker5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLianne Wheelock / Lisa Hamrick vs Katie Mason / Kristen Stevenson Fallon6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Abby Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.46
Alyssa Blanchard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Lianne Wheelock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Carlynn Musil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Madeleine Moore
published
4.24
Kacey Rugg
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.22
Madison Conwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.16
Kristin Estes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Teri Grote
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Marlene Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.12
Sally Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Katie Meyers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Amy Redfield
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.95
Lisa Hamrick
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.81
Cory Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Amanda Willoughby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Morgan Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Olivia Bekkala
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.47
Kay Wescott
published
Katherine Mathis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Nguyen + Amy Redfield12175% games+15.5% vs expected
Teri Grote + Carlynn Musil5353% games−3.7% vs expected
Alyssa Blanchard + Teri Grote404 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Hamrick + Amy Redfield314 matchesnot enough data
Madison Conwell + Cory Hunter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Abby Carpenter
7W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Alyssa Blanchard
13W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%38%
4.46
Lianne Wheelock
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Carlynn Musil
32W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
Madeleine Moore
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.25
Kacey Rugg
37W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
Madison Conwell
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Kristin Estes
26W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Teri Grote
42W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
Marlene Robinson
22W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
Sally Nguyen
57W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.12
Katie Meyers
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Amy Redfield
68W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.97
Lisa Hamrick
48W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Cory Hunter
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Amanda Willoughby
37W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Morgan Gardner
23W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Olivia Bekkala
11W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Kay Wescott
66W–38L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Katherine Mathis
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.