Teams

6 Deep Run Houff

2021 Richmond Combo Weekend · Combo Men 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Combo Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Billy Fulwider
published 4.5
3.96
Keith Harvey
published
3.86
Adam Decker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Sam McKelvey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Dremon Miller
published 4
3.59
Brad Houff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.50
John Evko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Bert Foreman
published 3.5
AJ James
published 3.5
Chad Eldridge
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Houff + John Evko5360% gamesnot enough data
Adam Decker + Sam McKelvey6153% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Billy Fulwider
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.22
Keith Harvey
16W–11L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Adam Decker
149W–62L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Sam McKelvey
158W–91L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Dremon Miller
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Brad Houff
114W–106L career · 6 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
John Evko
72W–47L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Bert Foreman
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
AJ James
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Chad Eldridge
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.