Teams

Hamilton Mill (Lori D'Adamio)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.5 Women (Kimberly De Fino)

18 players · average NTRP 3.14 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women (Kimberly De Fino) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Lisamarie Lackey
published
Bilquis Boykin
published 3.5
Heidi Martin
published 3.5
3.17
Katie Benzinger
published
3.04
Michelle Ashwood
published
3.01
Chris Dalrymple
published 3
2.96
Lori D'Adamio
published
2.87
Elaine Schenck
published 3
Angie Hutson
published 3
Gail Tucker
published 3
2.75
Allison Heusel
published 3
Donna Tinkoff
published
Jeanette Roberts
published
Linda Scherruble
published
Liz Dobbs
published
Paula Conner
published
Rebecca Neal
published
Sarah Reagin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Schenck + Chris Dalrymple3258% games+12.8% vs expected
Michelle Ashwood + Lori D'Adamio8361% games+6.5% vs expected
Donna Tinkoff + Michelle Ashwood2447% games+0.3% vs expected
Chris Dalrymple + Lori D'Adamio4849% games−2.0% vs expected
Chris Dalrymple + Michelle Ashwood7652% games−2.4% vs expected
Chris Dalrymple + Angie Hutson3645% games−2.8% vs expected
Elaine Schenck + Michelle Ashwood1543% games−3.1% vs expected
Gail Tucker + Michelle Ashwood3546% games−3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisamarie Lackey
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Bilquis Boykin
12W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Heidi Martin
14W–28L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Katie Benzinger
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Michelle Ashwood
55W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Chris Dalrymple
56W–49L career · no lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.01
Lori D'Adamio
59W–55L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Elaine Schenck
31W–55L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Angie Hutson
12W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Gail Tucker
5W–32L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Allison Heusel
8W–20L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.75
Donna Tinkoff
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeanette Roberts
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Scherruble
15W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Liz Dobbs
20W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paula Conner
13W–43L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Neal
13W–37L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Reagin
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.