Teams

Taylor

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Combined

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-19vs STL/Shouldis/55&Over7.0MXDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Hunter / Simone Cummings vs Michelle Brower-Kitchens / James Richter3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKevin Mowery / Sharon Taysi vs Karen Ebert Meyer / Kurt Feigley6-1, 6-1
2024-09-12vs STL/Shouldis/55&Over7.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnthony McDonald / Pamela Baumgart vs Julie Miller / Sam Shouldis3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJames Hunter / Gloria Lewis vs Martina Augsburger / William Dannevik4-6, 1-6
2024-09-05vs STL/Shouldis/55&Over7.0MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Hunter / Simone Cummings vs Jane Herder / Nicholas Damato3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnthony McDonald / Sharon Taysi vs Martina Augsburger / James Richter2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Mowery / Pamela Baumgart vs Michelle Brower-Kitchens / William Dannevik7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-29vs STL/Shouldis/55&Over7.0MXDWon 21
L#1 DoublesBob Jurczyk / Jacqueline Hamilton vs Joseph Delsignore / Denise Foley2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Taysi / Anthony McDonald vs Kurt Feigley / Shannon Lemp6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPamela Baumgart / Kevin Mowery vs Nicholas Damato / Jane Herder7-5, 7-5
2024-08-22vs STL/Shouldis/55&Over7.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesBob Jurczyk / Pamela Baumgart vs Denise Foley / Sam Shouldis3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJames Hunter / Jacqueline Hamilton vs Martina Augsburger / William Dannevik4-6, 4-6
2024-08-15vs STL/Shouldis/55&Over7.0MXDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Hunter / Simone Cummings vs Eric Martin / Shannon Lemp7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGloria Lewis / Arthur Banks vs Martina Augsburger / James Richter2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Combined have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Kevin Mowery
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Sharon Taysi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Gloria Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Pamela Baumgart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Jacqueline Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Bob Jurczyk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roy Taylor
published
Simone Cummings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Mowery
77W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Sharon Taysi
69W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11
Gloria Lewis
88W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Pamela Baumgart
78W–85L career · 4 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
Jacqueline Hamilton
59W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Bob Jurczyk
15W–19L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Roy Taylor
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Simone Cummings
54W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.