Teams

Pa.Hankerson18C6.5

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-09-29vs Ka.Johnston18CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAshley McRae / Sarah Wireback vs Jennifer Kuzma / Erin Wynia2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelsey Barrasso / Megan Barrasso vs Denise Decandia / Cari DeCandia1-6, 1-6
2024-09-23vs Cl.Owens18CWon 21
L#1 DoublesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan / Pamela Hankerson vs Claire Owens / Perry LeGaux6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChequetta Ann Nobles Hall / Sarah Wireback vs Julie Lee / Catherine Chavez6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMegan Barrasso / Kelsey Barrasso vs Michaela DeSoucey / Courtney Hodgson6-1, 6-0
2024-09-09vs St.Grose18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Wireback / Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall vs Kelly Hollis / Jennifer Troch4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Barrasso / Kelsey Barrasso vs Jill David / Karen Hepp3-6, 5-7
2024-09-04vs Ch.Waychoff18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley McRae / Sarah Wireback vs Lauren King / Kristen Levine6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan / Pamela Hankerson vs Joy Millikan / Laurie Holderness6-4, 7-6
2024-09-02vs Li.Kempf18CLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley McRae / Taqiyya Yasin vs Jessica Phillips / Heather Tuttle3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKelsey Barrasso / Megan Barrasso vs Griffin Lamb / Liza Eaton0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesQUEEN HARGROVE / Michelle Mills vs Betsy Fulcher / Emily Larson4-6, 2-6
2024-08-19vs Ju.Andrews18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Wireback / Ashley McRae vs Julianne Andrews / Jennifer Badham1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Barrasso / Kelsey Barrasso vs Lorah Henry / Kelly Jones4-6, 6-7
2024-08-12vs Do.Hovis18CLost 12
W#1 DoublesAshley McRae / Sarah Wireback vs Elizabeth Bieber / Paige Boyles6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMegan Barrasso / Kelsey Barrasso vs Leah Curran / Michele Storr4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesQUEEN HARGROVE / Michelle Mills vs Stephanie Charlino / Jennifer Martin6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-08-05vs Ca.Grimes18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley McRae / Sarah Wireback vs Rachel Pisciotta / Beth Holden6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan / Kelsey Barrasso vs Elie Foy / Donnarie Hales6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChequetta Ann Nobles Hall / Taqiyya Yasin vs Jerri Lemanski / Anne Bailey3-6, 3-6
2024-07-29vs La.Redmond18CLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley McRae / Michelle Mills vs Hannah Boghosian / Liz Arcos2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelsey Barrasso / Megan Barrasso vs Nicole Peterson / Lauren Redmond2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan / Sarah Wireback vs Laurie Reiss / Ana Maria Allessi3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Ashley McRae
usually #1 Doubles 87%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.25
3.12
Taqiyya Yasin
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 3
3.08
Pamela Hankerson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.01
Sarah Wireback
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 3
2.99
Michelle Mills
published
2.82
Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.81
Kelsey Barrasso
published
2.81
Megan Barrasso
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.66
QUEEN HARGROVE
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Barrasso + Kelsey Barrasso5459% games+7.8% vs expected
Pamela Hankerson + Ashley McRae91051% games−0.2% vs expected
QUEEN HARGROVE + Pamela Hankerson31338% games−5.9% vs expected
QUEEN HARGROVE + Ashley McRae91346% games−6.0% vs expected
QUEEN HARGROVE + Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan0830% games−8.5% vs expected
Ashley McRae + Sarah Wireback6259% gamesnot enough data
Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan + Taqiyya Yasin4352% gamesnot enough data
Megan Barrasso + Taqiyya Yasin224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley McRae
164W–155L career · 15 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
18W–17L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Taqiyya Yasin
150W–89L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.12
3.5
Pamela Hankerson
96W–202L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Sarah Wireback
63W–38L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
Michelle Mills
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
124W–174L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
2.82
Kelsey Barrasso
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Megan Barrasso
37W–47L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
QUEEN HARGROVE
107W–205L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
Bernadette David-Yerumo
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.