Teams

KSummers (Park Road)

2022 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-28vs LO'Shea (Southampton)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Miles / Virginia Borkey vs Pat Rudisill / Catherine Lineberger7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-21vs LO'Shea (Southampton)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMildred Hurd / Anita Matai vs Melissa Chitu / Julia Payne3-6, 3-6
2022-04-14vs LO'Shea (Southampton)Split 11
L#2 DoublesMildred Hurd / Anita Matai vs Michelle Davis / Cindy Wilson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFreida Haselden / Virginia Borkey vs Pat Rudisill / Catherine Lineberger6-4, 6-4
2022-04-07vs LO'Shea (Southampton)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesVirginia Borkey / Freida Haselden vs Melissa Chitu / Lisa O'Shea5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMildred Hurd / Penelope Powell vs Michelle Davis / Susie McCraney2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-31Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVirginia Borkey / Laura Hatfield vs Cindy Wilson / Michelle Davis4-6, 2-6
2022-03-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesMildred Hurd / Anita Matai vs Michelle Davis / Mary Browne6-2, 6-0
2022-03-10vs LO'Shea (Southampton)Split 11
L#2 DoublesVirginia Borkey / Freida Haselden vs Cindy Wilson / Michelle Davis1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMildred Hurd / Anita Matai vs Susan Stover / Lisa O'Shea6-2, 6-4
2022-03-03Won 20
W#2 DoublesVirginia Borkey / Laura Hatfield vs Cindy Wilson / Catherine Lineberger7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Summers / Anita Matai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Anita Matai
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Jennifer Miles
published
2.60
Mildred Hurd
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Laura Hatfield
published
2.40
Freida Haselden
published 3
2.36
Virginia Borkey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Karen Summers
published
Penelope Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mildred Hurd + Anita Matai224 matchesnot enough data
Penelope Powell + Mildred Hurd123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anita Matai
54W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
Jennifer Miles
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Mildred Hurd
47W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Laura Hatfield
30W–37L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Freida Haselden
3W–17L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.40
3
Virginia Borkey
23W–56L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.36
Karen Summers
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Penelope Powell
17W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.