Teams

Platinum Ladies

2023 55&Over Women · 6.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-09vs Western: Golden GirlsLost 02
L#2 DoublesMarcy Lofaso / Jill Morrish vs Linda Nappo / Kathy Benzinger1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPeg White / Geraldine Neff vs Annie Grace / Virginia Filiaci2-6, 1-6
2023-08-07vs Western: Golden GirlsLost 03
L#1 DoublesToni Baller / Marcy Lofaso vs Annie Grace / Sandra Picerno3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Illig / Peg White vs Virginia Filiaci / Psyche Li1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeb Bill / Deborah New vs Joanne Mendiola / Paula Zagrobelny2-6, 2-6
2023-08-02vs Western: Golden GirlsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarcy Lofaso / Sandra Illig vs Linda Nappo / Kathy Benzinger2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGeraldine Neff / Peg White vs Paula Zagrobelny / Virginia Filiaci1-6, 1-6
2023-07-31vs Western: Golden GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Abels / Peg White vs Psyche Li / Sandra Picerno1-6, 1-6
2023-07-26vs Western: Golden GirlsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandra Illig / Marcy Lofaso vs Paula Zagrobelny / Kim Collins1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPeg White / Geraldine Neff vs Jane Fuller / Linda Nappo3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesToni Baller / Deborah New vs Kathy Benzinger / Donna Decarolis1-6, 4-6
2023-07-24vs Western: Golden GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Abels / Peg White vs Kathy Benzinger / Donna Decarolis2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesToni Baller / Marcy Lofaso vs Psyche Li / Annie Grace0-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Fauna Pappalardo-Minges
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.02
Andrea Abels
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
2.96
Marcy Lofaso
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.36
Deborah New
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Peg White
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Toni Baller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fauna Pappalardo-Minges
24W–39L career · 7 lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.27
3.5
Andrea Abels
16W–27L career · 11 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Marcy Lofaso
2W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.96
3
Deborah New
10W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.36
Peg White
2W–12L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Toni Baller
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.