Teams

GEPTA/Uraga/Adult 18 & over/4.5M

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 4.64 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.41 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
JACOBO CARDIEL
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 39% · published 5
Erick Torres
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.31
Edgar Ruiz
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
Alexandre Mouquin
published 4.5
Creighton Jones
published 4.5
Gustavo Ganem
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Adrian Guevara
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
John Schatzman
published
Juan Uraga
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Mauricio de Regules
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Mohanad Elchouemi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nathan Brown
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ramon Barreno
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
Rene Archuleta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Travis Fortune
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Trevor Rivera
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Ulrich Delafuente
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Creighton Jones + Ulrich Delafuente17261% games+1.9% vs expected
Erick Torres + Ulrich Delafuente4161% gamesnot enough data
Erick Torres + Gustavo Ganem213 matchesnot enough data
Ramon Barreno + Edgar Ruiz033 matchesnot enough data
Rene Archuleta + Ulrich Delafuente303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
JACOBO CARDIEL
14W–9L career · 13 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.76
5
Erick Torres
43W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Edgar Ruiz
41W–35L career · 15 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Alexandre Mouquin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Creighton Jones
29W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Gustavo Ganem
18W–17L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Adrian Guevara
50W–34L career · 10 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.15
John Schatzman
45W–40L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Juan Uraga
94W–33L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mauricio de Regules
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mohanad Elchouemi
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathan Brown
59W–32L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ramon Barreno
44W–25L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rene Archuleta
52W–23L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Fortune
17W–9L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trevor Rivera
39W–47L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ulrich Delafuente
61W–26L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.