Teams

Seute (Coral Reef)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 55 & Over - Spring · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-19vs Lehman (Dante Fascell)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAntony van Smith / Fernando Cruz vs Scott Lehman / Gus Deribeaux6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-11vs MOSKOVITZ (Ron Ehmann)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVincent Warger / Fernando Cruz vs Felipe Blanco / Hubert Fonte6-7, 2-6
2025-03-04vs Lehman (Dante Fascell)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGene McLean / Fernando Cruz vs Scott Lehman / Gus Deribeaux0-6, 1-6
2025-02-25vs Miami/Leon/55&over7.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesAntony van Smith / Fernando Cruz vs Thierry Moser / Paulo Zampietro3-6, 1-6
2025-02-11vs Lehman (Dante Fascell)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTroy Wee Tom / Fernando Cruz vs Scott Lehman / Gus Deribeaux0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-04vs Miami/Leon/55&over7.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesTroy Wee Tom / Fernando Cruz vs Tony Blank / Paulo Zampietro2-6, 3-6
2025-01-28vs MOSKOVITZ (Ron Ehmann)Won 10
W#2 DoublesTroy Wee Tom / Fernando Cruz vs Luis Rodriguez / Ruben Leyva7-5, 6-2
2025-01-15vs Miami/Leon/55&over7.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesTroy Wee Tom / Fernando Cruz vs Tony Blank / Thierry Moser3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Troy Wee Tom
published
3.28
Anthony Seute
published 3.5
2.76
Antony van Smith
published 3
Fernando Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Marco Malfavon
published
Mark D'Aguilar
published
Navzor Balsara
published
Neil Bazain
published
Orlando Pagan
published
Vincent Warger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark D'Aguilar + Antony van Smith1436% gamesnot enough data
Neil Bazain + Vincent Warger044 matchesnot enough data
Marco Malfavon + Troy Wee Tom213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Troy Wee Tom
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Anthony Seute
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3
Antony van Smith
3W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Fernando Cruz
33W–52L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marco Malfavon
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark D'Aguilar
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Navzor Balsara
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Neil Bazain
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Orlando Pagan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vincent Warger
0W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.