Teams

BAY:Amherst Aces:Hirsh

2023 WMA Adult 55 & Over Men · 8.0 Men 1

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-17vs ETC:Enfield Court Jesters:MayoWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Seibert / Niels Christiansen vs Bruce Beckstead / Bayard Faithfull7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Clancy / Paul Gravel vs Michael Racine / John Reisert7-5, 7-5
2023-05-07vs ETC:Enfield Court Jesters:MayoLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Clancy / David Hernandez vs John Reisert / Sean Smith1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNiels Christiansen / Christopher Seibert vs Kevin Imbt / Bayard Faithfull3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-04-01vs ETC:Enfield Court Jesters:MayoWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Getler / Niels Christiansen vs Michael Racine / John Homer7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BAY:Amherst Aces:Hirsh329612116
2ETC:Enfield Court Jesters:Mayo329616138
3LTC:Ballboys 55:Nicoletta/Friguglietti2451327172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Christopher Seibert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Jonathan Hirsh
published
3.52
Richard Getler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
David Hernandez
published 3.5
Alden Booth
published
Michael Clancy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nathan Treloar
published
Niels Christiansen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Gravel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Seibert + Niels Christiansen9362% gamesnot enough data
Richard Getler + Niels Christiansen5166% gamesnot enough data
Alden Booth + Richard Getler3254% gamesnot enough data
Michael Clancy + Niels Christiansen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Seibert
48W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Jonathan Hirsh
40W–32L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Richard Getler
133W–84L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
David Hernandez
35W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Alden Booth
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Clancy
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nathan Treloar
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Niels Christiansen
27W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul Gravel
24W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.