Teams

BC-Kramer/SarahPucci3.0

2026 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-28vs BC-MiraCosta/KarieLanterman3.0Won 31
W#1 DoublesRenee Royles / Nadine Wong vs Anna OBrien / Valerie Real6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Traut / Cara Lentz vs Christine McFarland / Amy Papanikolas6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLauren Herwitt vs Camille Manquen6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJulia Vander Ploeg / Sheryl Caspellan Soni vs Sharon Alston / Kimberly Toney1-6, 0-6
2026-06-07vs BC-ErnieHowlett/LanVera3.0Won 32
W#1 DoublesDiana Fasoletti / Cara Lentz vs Grace Day / Christine Anderson7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNadine Wong vs Marcela Bermudez6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulia Vander Ploeg / Alexandra Traut vs Laura Savitz / Cindy Du1-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesLauren Herwitt vs Karen Lytle2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChotima Srichankrad / Sarah Pucci vs Ester Fungladda / Aya Tanaka1-6, 0-6
2026-05-31vs BC-WestEnd/TerriDiamond3.0Won 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Kim / Onwilasinee Stern vs Linda Snyder / Serena Jaklich6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDiana Fasoletti vs Caitlin Mcgilley4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Herwitt / Gina Brady vs Leslie Gibbs / Cheryl Unrein6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCara Lentz / Marissa Hewitt vs Eve Gentry / Susan Irvine6-1, 6-3
2026-05-17vs BC-MiraCosta/KarenNolan3.0Lost 05
L#1 DoublesMarissa Hewitt / Kelly Kim vs Ellie Macdonald / Sonia Malhotra4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDonna-Marie Ericson vs Tracy Carter3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Chen / Julia Vander Ploeg vs Erin Levin / Kristina O'Brien1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesGina Brady vs Maureen Matthews4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarcia Augsburger / Chotima Srichankrad vs Danielle Alfi / Stephanie Hanger2-6, 2-6
2026-05-03vs BC-SouthEnd/BridgetParrilla3.0Won 32
W#1 DoublesGina Brady / Renee Royles vs Elizabeth McRae / Carolyn LaRocca2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKelly Kim vs Laurie Porter7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Cole / Cara Lentz vs Daryl Fiske / Romi Worst5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesOnwilasinee Stern vs Karen Lyons7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSheryl Caspellan Soni / Sarah Pucci vs Jennifer Minich / Kim Tyler1-6, 0-6
2026-04-26vs BC-MCC/NahiaHossain3.0Lost 23
W#1 DoublesDiana Fasoletti / Donna-Marie Ericson vs Susanne Elstein / Caitlin Coffey6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNadine Wong vs Sarah Lee6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJudy Chen / Julia Vander Ploeg vs Candice Maloney / Staci Carey6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesGina Brady vs Lauren Clayton3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJill Medawar / Marcia Augsburger vs Patti Panucci / Ashita Johnson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-19vs BC-MCC/ShefaliRao3.0Lost 23
L#1 DoublesSue Kim / Marissa Hewitt vs Jenny Peterson / Brittany Phillips3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Kim vs Heather Baboolal6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClara Inciso-Brevig / Renee Royles vs Cambria McCulloch / Neeraj Rotondo3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDonna-Marie Ericson vs KARYN EILBER3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGina Brady / Lauren Herwitt vs Shefali Rao / Connie Kim6-3, 7-5
2026-04-12vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/JoAnnIshii3.0Lost 13
W#1 DoublesDiana Fasoletti / Onwilasinee Stern vs Cindy Emanuel / Garima Goel6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesNadine Wong vs Amy Wolfberg6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDenise Kelley / Jill Medawar vs Angie Pradia / Meghann Seidner3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChotima Srichankrad / Sarah Pucci vs Elizabeth Leiner / Meredith Cruse0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · BC Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-LLW-AltaVista/JoAnnIshii3.071301026275
2BC-MCC/ShefaliRao3.053221837312
3BC-Kramer/SarahPucci3.044172352401

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Onwilasinee Stern
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.13
Renee Royles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Nadine Wong
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
2.92
Kelly Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.88
Lauren Herwitt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Donna-Marie Ericson
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Diana Fasoletti
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Alexandra Traut
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Denise Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Cara Lentz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Marissa Hewitt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Clara Inciso-Brevig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Jill Medawar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Gina Brady
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.35
Chotima Srichankrad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.29
Julia Vander Ploeg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.21
Sarah Pucci
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kat Kolb
published
Marcia Augsburger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sheryl Caspellan Soni
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nadine Wong + Kelly Kim7364% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Onwilasinee Stern
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Renee Royles
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.13
Nadine Wong
19W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Kelly Kim
22W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Lauren Herwitt
6W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Donna-Marie Ericson
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Diana Fasoletti
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Alexandra Traut
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Denise Kelley
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Cara Lentz
7W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Marissa Hewitt
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Clara Inciso-Brevig
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Jill Medawar
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.62
3
Gina Brady
8W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Chotima Srichankrad
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.35
Julia Vander Ploeg
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.29
Sarah Pucci
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.21
Kat Kolb
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcia Augsburger
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheryl Caspellan Soni
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.