Teams

Welty

Sequoyah Christmas Tournament Flex 40&Over · 40 & Over Ladies Flex (3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-22vs JonesLost 12
L#1 DoublesBonnie Burden / Jewel Akpose vs Renee McClanahan / Dawn Wright6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Graves / Ann Carroll vs Lisa McCanless / Nina Banks3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Martinez / Amy Mitchell vs Vivian White / Cami Marcus6-2, 6-4
2024-12-08vs JonesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBonnie Burden / Tara McFarlane vs Renee McClanahan / Jill Peacock3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKarlene Welty / Julie Graves vs Lisa McCanless / Jackie Smithwick6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2024-12-06vs JonesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJewel Akpose / Bonnie Burden vs Jill Peacock / Dawn Wright6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Carroll / Carol Martinez vs Cami Marcus / Jackie Smithwick6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Graves / Karlene Welty vs Vivian White / Nina Banks6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Ladies Flex (3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jewel Akpose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Tara McFarlane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Bonnie Burden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Carol Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Karlene Welty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Julie Graves
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Ann Carroll
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jewel Akpose + Tara McFarlane5349% games+0.6% vs expected
Bonnie Burden + Jewel Akpose3344% games−10.5% vs expected
Karlene Welty + Bonnie Burden224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jewel Akpose
71W–78L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Tara McFarlane
67W–97L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Bonnie Burden
26W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Carol Martinez
55W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Karlene Welty
22W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
Julie Graves
19W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.